Re: [gentoo-dev] New Eclasses: postgres and postgres-multi

On 2016-01-25 10:31, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 23/01/16 10:51 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On Jan 22, 2016, at 3:11 PM, Aaron W. Swenson > >> wrote: > >> > >> I would like some feedback on the documentation/comments in > >> the eclass. I'm certain it could be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New Eclasses: postgres and postgres-multi

On 2016-01-25 22:34, Jonathan Callen wrote: > On 01/25/2016 07:29 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > > On 2016-01-24 18:44, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> On 01/24/2016 06:29 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > >>> Okay, provided that the new USE_EXPAND is okay for > >>> POSTGRES_TARGETS, attached are the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] ebuild-writing/misc-files: remove ChangeLog section #485314

> On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > Ulrich Mueller: >> The devmanual is the one central place where our development >> workflow should be documented, not some random wiki page. >> > If the most up-to-date information is on the wiki, constantly > updating devmanual to match the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] ebuild-writing/misc-files: remove ChangeLog section #485314

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ulrich Mueller: >> On Sun, 24 Jan 2016, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> The ChangeLog page is nonsense as-is, and removing it makes the >> devmanual better. Afterwards, if someone wants to take the commit >> message guidelines from the wiki and

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge-webrsync: suppress tar future timestamp warning (bug 572578)

As reported in bug 572578, the gentoo rsync repository contains a file which intentionally has a future timestamp. Since tar future timestamp warnings are irrelevant, suppress them if tar supports the option. X-Gentoo-Bug: 572578 X-Gentoo-Bug-url: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=572578

Re: [gentoo-dev] New packages up for grabs

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:32:06AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > net-libs/libtorrent > net-p2p/rtorrent I'll take these -- Jason

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento > napisał(a): >>On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher >>> --- >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On 26/01/16 15:10, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 1:50 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento >> napisał(a): >>> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote:

[gentoo-dev] New schema language for metadata validation?

All, TL;DR: I think we should switch from DTD to RELAX NG (compact syntax, ideally) for our XML validation needs. It is more expressive and more readable. Most people who know anything about XML stuff know that DTDs are not that great a solution for validation. Their expression power is very

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-eselect/eselect-maven

# James Le Cuirot (26 Jan 2016) # Now part of eselect-java. Removal in 30 days. app-eselect/eselect-maven -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgp61k0Nno5iP.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/webcdwriter

# James Le Cuirot (26 Jan 2016) # No new release since 2008. Removal in 30 days. app-cdr/webcdwriter -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgpk42l6SqYNs.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] New schema language for metadata validation?

On 01/26/2016 02:52 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > All, > > TL;DR: I think we should switch from DTD to RELAX NG (compact syntax, > ideally) for our XML validation needs. It is more expressive and more > readable. > A great idea. > What other stuff would need to be updated? > I would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/webcdwriter

James Le Cuirot wrote: > # James Le Cuirot (26 Jan 2016) > # No new release since 2008. Removal in 30 days. > app-cdr/webcdwriter Is there a problem with it? I don't use it and have no interest in this particular package but merely lack of release is not a valid reason to

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] GLEP 67 is in, please update your metadata.dtd!

Hello again, On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:37:15 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Please note that the metadata.dtd is unable to correctly enforce > obligatory type="" attribute on maintainers. Please make sure to add > it. I will be adding pkgcheck/repoman checks for that soon. As

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-cdr/webcdwriter

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:55:15 +0100 Peter Stuge wrote: > James Le Cuirot wrote: > > # James Le Cuirot (26 Jan 2016) > > # No new release since 2008. Removal in 30 days. > > app-cdr/webcdwriter > > Is there a problem with it? I don't use it and have no

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

Dnia 26 stycznia 2016 13:36:00 CET, Davide Pesavento napisał(a): >On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher >> --- >> eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] cmake-utils.eclass: Define default EAPI to 0

On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Justin Lecher wrote: > Signed-off-by: Justin Lecher > --- > eclass/cmake-utils.eclass | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass b/eclass/cmake-utils.eclass > index