[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-03-06 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-03-06 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-java/bytecode 20160306-12:59 chewi b1efc72 dev-java/concurrent-util 20160303-13:16 chewi 2140f02 dev-java/dsiutils

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapply_user: allow empty directories

> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: >> --- a/bin/phase-helpers.sh >> +++ b/bin/phase-helpers.sh >> @@ -1089,6 +1089,10 @@ if ___eapi_has_eapply_user; then >> local basedir=${PORTAGE_CONFIGROOT%/}/etc/portage/patches >> >> local d applied >> +

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] eapply_user: allow empty directories

On 03/06/2016 03:01 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Without this, an empty directory in > /etc/portage/patches/$cat/$pkg will result in an fatal error. > > Fixes: 573920 > Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld > --- > bin/phase-helpers.sh | 8 +++- > 1 file changed, 7

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 20:49, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > > > >>> So I guess we could use

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > >>> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >>> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >>> ? > >> Prolly. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > > Davide Pesavento wrote: > > >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > Davide Pesavento wrote: >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >> ? > Prolly. > Just to be clear, I have no clue what the original use

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > > "Justin " wrote: > > > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> > On Sun,

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 18:18, Michał Górny wrote: >> We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. > > Why? What's their use? In fact, does have any use? Because as I > see it, it's just some fancy feature that could turn package name into > link to packages.gentoo.org and nothing more... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 7 March 2016 at 07:12, Justin wrote: >> Slots are not accepted in elements? Is that intentional? If so, >> is there something else we can use? >> > > We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. Enable HTML5 audio/video support via media-libs/gstreamer:1.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > >> Michał Górny wrote: > >> > >>> Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >>> of current

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portdbapi.aux_get: don't cache in memory unless frozen

On Fri, 4 Mar 2016 23:14:59 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: > Fix the portdbapi aux_get method to cache metadata in memory only when > the "frozen" flag has been set, so that applications do not consume > more memory than necessary. This change does not affect depgraph >

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portdbapi.aux_get: don't cache in memory unless frozen

Fix the portdbapi aux_get method to cache metadata in memory only when the "frozen" flag has been set, so that applications do not consume more memory than necessary. This change does not affect depgraph performance, since depgraph caches the metadata separately (in Package instances).

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] bin/portageq: add a matcher to match the orphaned (maintainer-needed) packages

Per GLEP 67, orphaned packages do not have a in metadata.xml. They can't be matched using '--maintainer-email=maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org' anymore. Add a new command line argument '--orphaned' to match the orphaned packages. Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek ---

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/perdition

# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #491372 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. net-mail/perdition -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] bin/portageq: add a matcher to match the orphaned (maintainer-needed) packages

Per GLEP 67, orphaned packages do not have a in metadata.xml. They can't be matched using '--maintainer-email=maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org' anymore. Add a new command line argument '--orphaned' to match the orphaned packages. Signed-off-by: Göktürk Yüksek ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] amd64 systemd stage3

On 3/4/16 12:46 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 3/4/16 11:37 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> El vie, 04-03-2016 a las 07:39 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió: >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I've been working the last few days on building amd64 systemd >>> stage3's. >>> After solving some dependency

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/dragonflycms

# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #448826 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. www-apps/dragonflycms -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:04:22 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-mail/perdition

# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #491372 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. net-mail/perdition -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc Description:

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apps/dragonflycms

# Aaron Bauman (05 Mar 2016) # Per security bug #448826 this package is vulnerable # and unmaintained. Removal in 30 days. www-apps/dragonflycms -- Cheers, Aaron Bauman Gentoo Linux Developer GnuPG FP: 1536 F4B3 72EB 9C54 11F5 5C43 246D 23A2 10FB 0F3E signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). And here's the list: /var/db/repos/gentoo/app-crypt/eid-mw/metadata.xml:26: element

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd