Re: [gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project

In my humble opinion, sunrise is a needless layer of bureaucracy to getting new packages into the tree. Personlly, I think it's not a bad idea for new packages to be submitted as enhancements directly on bugzilla, possibly CCing any relevant projects who could provide a review. On Mon, Jun 6,

[gentoo-dev] The future of the Sunrise project

Hello, everyone. It has recently came to my attention that things are quite bad with the Sunrise project [1] lately. Most of the developers have left the project, and it seems that the contributors have done the same. The public reviewed repository has major QA issues and hasn't been updated

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can ATs add missing test deps?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Montag, 6. Juni 2016, 10:22:01 schrieb Tobias Klausmann: > Hi! > > It happens every now and then that during ATing, I find that > USE=test should pull in extra deps. This usually is an easy and > not exactly controversial fix. > > What's the

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > I'm not totally convinced yet. > Following the BCP-47 spec the format is > Language-Tag = langtag ; normal language tags > langtag = language > ["-" script] > ["-" region] >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gtk/gtk2/gtk3 USE flag situation

On 05/30/2016 04:46 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > NP, there are 2 patches floating on the MATE ml that move the dependency on > sys-power/upower-pm-utils > consolekit(suspend/resume is handled by consolekit instead). Wold you be > interested to > add those to gentoo MATE? > > Jocke > I'm

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

Ulrich Mueller schrieb: On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: Ulrich Mueller schrieb: Question related to this, do we take the opportunity to standardise the values? Looks like the vast majority follows language[_territory][@modifier] specified by POSIX [1] but some don't.

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

I'm not a gentoo developer yet (rl drama has majorly lagged me on getting my quizzes done) but if there's a way I can help it I wouldn't mind. On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM, Yury German wrote: > Well a few things need to happen: > > 1. app-text/tidy-html5 - Need to go

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

Well a few things need to happen: 1. app-text/tidy-html5 - Need to go Stabl 2. dep and rdep need to be migrated to tidy-html5 and tested. Since Patrice (monsieurp) is the maintainer of tidy-html5, do you want to become maintainer of htmltidy temporarily to help kill it and move to tidy-html5?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

On 04/06/16 01:40 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 06/03/2016 09:07 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: >> On 03/06/16 11:26 PM, Nick Vinson wrote: >>> >>> [ Snip! ] In cases where there's more than 1 option, you have to >>> either introduce RESTRICTED_USE as Patrick alluded to, or decide a >>> pecking

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

If tidy-html5 can take care of anything htmltidy can, then we can boot the latter as obsolete anyhow. Are there any backwards compatibility issues if we just punt it and let tidy-html5 take over? On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:15 AM, Yury German wrote: > > > On 6/5/16 8:02 PM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

On 6/5/16 8:02 PM, Patrice Clement wrote: > Sunday 05 Jun 2016 19:39:26, Yury German wrote : >> app-text/htmltidy currently has no maintainers. It has a vulnerability >> [Security Bug] filed against it. And a number of other [package depend >> on it]. Is nyone willing to pick it up? >> >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can ATs add missing test deps?

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 12:36 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> It happens every now and then that during ATing, I find that >> USE=test should pull in extra deps. This usually is an easy and >> not exactly controversial fix. > > +1 > > I dont think anyone should be prevented from

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can ATs add missing test deps?

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:22:01 +0200 Tobias Klausmann wrote: > Hi! > > It happens every now and then that during ATing, I find that > USE=test should pull in extra deps. This usually is an easy and > not exactly controversial fix. > +1 I dont think anyone should be

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Ulrich Mueller schrieb: >> Question related to this, do we take the opportunity to standardise >> the values? Looks like the vast majority follows >> language[_territory][@modifier] specified by POSIX [1] but some >> don't. > What

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

Ulrich Mueller schrieb: On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote: Usually only two letter language codes suffice, but can be limited with country codes with a 'll_CC' formatting, where 'll' is the language code and 'CC' is the country code, e.g en_GB. Some rare languages also have three

[gentoo-dev] Can ATs add missing test deps?

Hi! It happens every now and then that during ATing, I find that USE=test should pull in extra deps. This usually is an easy and not exactly controversial fix. What's the hive mind's opinion on letting ATs add such deps if: - Only one level deep, but multiple first-level deps are ok - The deps

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > Usually only two letter language codes suffice, but can be limited with > country codes with a 'll_CC' formatting, where 'll' is the language code > and 'CC' is the country code, e.g en_GB. Some rare languages also have > three letter language

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 03:22:34 +0300 Mart Raudsepp wrote: > First draft of news item for proceeding with LINGUAS USE_EXPAND rename > to L10N independently of the INSTALL_MASK feature additions. > > I hope English natives will improve the sentence flow and grammar here > :) >