Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > > It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it. > > Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"? > On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 01/14] cdrom.eclass: Detect case-insensitively and handle special characters

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 05:14:34 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > >> > @@ -243,4 +240,27 @@ _cdrom_locate_file_on_cd() { > >> > done > >> > } > >> > > >> > +# @FUNCTION: _cdrom_glob_match > >> > +# @USAGE: > >> > +# @INTERNAL > >> > +# @DESCRIPTION: > >> > +# Locates the

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item: changed default bedup configuration file in >=app-backup/burp-2.0.0

Gokturk Yuksek writes: > Overall, my impression is that people handle conf file changes in > pkg_postinst() with REPLACING_VERSIONS rather than news items. +1. And it could be automated for the user, couldn't be? Cheers, -- Amadeusz Żołnowski signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

> It is stable. Even there are open bugs, arches started stabilizing it. Is gcc-5.4.0 built "--with-default-libstdcxx-abi=gcc4-compatible"? On the Pale Moon linux sub-forum, there were crashing issues with the contributed Ubuntu build when Ubuntu switched to gcc 5. The maintainer of the Ubuntu

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dosym: protect Prefix hack from double EPREFIX

On śro, 2017-04-19 at 18:06 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > > Add an additional conditional to the dosym Prefix hack to ensure that > > the symlink is not using double Prefix when the ebuild uses ${EPREFIX} > > explicitly. This ensures that

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dosym: protect Prefix hack from double EPREFIX

> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> +if [[ ${target:0:1} == "/" && ${target} != "${EPREFIX}"* ]]; then > I think you want an additional slash in the second condition, in order > to prevent /foo/barbaz from matching if EPREFIX is equal to /foo/bar: > if [[ ${target:0:1} == "/" &&

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dosym: protect Prefix hack from double EPREFIX

> On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Michał Górny wrote: > Add an additional conditional to the dosym Prefix hack to ensure that > the symlink is not using double Prefix when the ebuild uses ${EPREFIX} > explicitly. This ensures that Portage on Prefix systems is both > compatible with the ebuilds relying

[gentoo-dev] News item: changed default bedup configuration file in >=app-backup/burp-2.0.0

-- MS Title: app-backup/burp: default config file for bedup Author: Marek Szuba Posted: 2017-04-24 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: app-backup/burp Starting with version 2.0.54, the default configuration file of the burp-aware deduplication tool bedup

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dosym: protect Prefix hack from double EPREFIX

Add an additional conditional to the dosym Prefix hack to ensure that the symlink is not using double Prefix when the ebuild uses ${EPREFIX} explicitly. This ensures that Portage on Prefix systems is both compatible with the ebuilds relying on the hack, and using dosym in the PMS-defined manner.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 9:31 AM, Jörg Schaible < joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: > >>

[gentoo-dev] Re: stable gcc 5.4.0 ??

Tomas Mozes wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible < > joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64: >> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1 >> >> However, after synching the tree,