Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] depgraph: prune unnecessary rebuilds for --autounmask-continue (bug 619626)

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 5:48 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:11:55 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > > > > > @@ -6224,10 +6283,10 @@ class depgraph(object): > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

On czw, 2017-06-01 at 20:17 -0500, A. Wilcox wrote: > unpopular, unwanted opinion: > > just have users of a *source based distro* where the emphasis is > *choice* actually choose what they want? > > What is the big deal with the way REQUIRED_USE works now? "Users have > to do something". You

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

On pią, 2017-06-02 at 04:56 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? > > 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php- > like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by > neither of vims,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Addition of a new field to metadata.xml

On 06/01/2017 06:09 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:18:22 +0200 > Jonas Stein wrote: > >> A space separated list of the corresponding debian packages should be >> written in the field >> > > Why space separated? > > Its already legal to specify the field

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/06/17 20:28, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:17 PM, A. Wilcox > wrote: >> >> just have users of a *source based distro* where the emphasis is >> *choice* actually choose what they want? >> >> What is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:17 PM, A. Wilcox wrote: > > just have users of a *source based distro* where the emphasis is > *choice* actually choose what they want? > > What is the big deal with the way REQUIRED_USE works now? "Users have > to do something". The issue is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 unpopular, unwanted opinion: just have users of a *source based distro* where the emphasis is *choice* actually choose what they want? What is the big deal with the way REQUIRED_USE works now? "Users have to do something". You always have to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or three other people > do their own forks? Plugin 1 works with vim A and B but not C or D. > Plugin 2 works with vim A and C and D but not B. The number of >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Addition of a new field to metadata.xml

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 23:18:22 +0200 Jonas Stein wrote: > A space separated list of the corresponding debian packages should be > written in the field > Why space separated? Its already legal to specify the field multiple times, and it should work better that way for

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH v2] depgraph: prune unnecessary rebuilds for --autounmask-continue (bug 619626)

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:11:55 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > > > @@ -6224,10 +6283,10 @@ class depgraph(object): > > iuses = > > pkg.iuse.all > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php- like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules for each of vim they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

On czw, 2017-06-01 at 10:55 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 31 May 2017 21:02:24 +0200 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On śro, 2017-05-31 at 19:39 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > > Again, you *need* to process the constraints in order. '!a? > > > > > ( b ) !b? ( a )'

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Addition of a new field to metadata.xml

Hello, this RFC is about the addition of a new field to metadata.xml The field should contain a list of the equivalent debian package names, or a defined string for NONE or UNSET. A feature request ticket was prepared here: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619132 1. Motivation

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] toolchain-funcs.eclass: use gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} when available

This will come in handy for users who enable LTO, since they need to use the gcc wrappers for 'ar', 'nm', and 'ranlib'. The default program search order becomes: ${CHOST}-gcc-ar ${CHOST}-ar gcc-ar ar This matches the behavior of a typical autoconf call: AC_CHECK_TOOLS(AR, [gcc-ar ar]) ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] toolchain-funcs.eclass: rework _tc-getPROG to accept a colon-separated list of default programs

--- eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass | 39 +++ 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass b/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass index a0c359a950b2..b402a9ff2780 100644 --- a/eclass/toolchain-funcs.eclass +++

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] depgraph: prune unnecessary rebuilds for --autounmask-continue (bug 619626)

When there are autounmask USE changes, avoid unnecessary rebuilds by accepting binary packages that were rejected due to the preexisting USE configuration. This reuses the prune_rebuilds backtracker support which was added for bug 439688. X-Gentoo-bug: 619626 X-Gentoo-bug-url:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:54:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote > > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to > > work with

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:54:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work > with both install to that directory. As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] depgraph: prune unnecessary rebuilds for --autounmask-continue (bug 619626)

On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Zac Medico wrote: > > @@ -4245,6 +4300,12 @@ class depgraph(object): > self._dynamic_config._skip_restart = True > return False, myfavorites > > + if

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Forced/automatic USE flag constraints (codename: ENFORCED_USE)

On Wed, 31 May 2017 21:02:24 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On śro, 2017-05-31 at 19:39 +0200, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > > Again, you *need* to process the constraints in order. '!a? > > > > ( b ) !b? ( a )' is not deterministic when none of a and b are > > > > enabled

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

> - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work > with both install to that directory. Actually it is almost the thing I described as "second" eselect variant. Although, you suggest for gentoo devs to

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: prune unnecessary rebuilds for --autounmask-continue (bug 619626)

When there are autounmask USE changes, avoid unnecessary rebuilds by accepting binary packages that were rejected due to the preexisting USE configuration. This reuses the prune_rebuilds backtracker support which was added for bug 439688. X-Gentoo-bug: 619626 X-Gentoo-bug-url: