Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 07:28:12PM -0400, Brian Evans wrote > It gets forced on with the 17.0 profile. Did you switch yet? Not yet. I'm currently delving further into an obscure ebuild failure for python, so that I can submit a more detailed bug report. Once I get that done (I already have

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

On 10/11/2017 04:33 PM, Walter Dnes wrote: > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:41:06AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > >> I'm on 6.3.0 on x86, which is currently unstable on *ALL* arches, and >> "emerge -pv =sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0" shows "(-pie)". > >And x86 32-bit gcc-6.4.0 shows (-pie) as well... > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 66 [git workflow] for another review round

On 10/11/2017 05:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, snip > - ``Reported-by: Full Name `` — usually indicates > full review, snip Hi, Is that was Reported-by usually indicates? I use it as upstream kernel and even github indicates, and thought this was the more common

[gentoo-dev] GLEP 66 [git workflow] for another review round

Hi, Since the git pre-GLEP was approved by the Council, I've converted it to reST and did a few cosmetic changes (rewording, clarification). Please take a one more look at the current wording: Text: https://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/tmp/glep-0066.rst HTML:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 12:41:06AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote > I'm on 6.3.0 on x86, which is currently unstable on *ALL* arches, and > "emerge -pv =sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0" shows "(-pie)". And x86 32-bit gcc-6.4.0 shows (-pie) as well...

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: www-client/elinks

Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: www-client/elinks after retirement of the proxied maintainer. www-client/elinks has several open bug tickets. Some with patches: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=www-client%2Felinks Upstream did not release for decades, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 08:10:02AM -0400, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > Some of these can take a while. Maybe we want to spell it out: > > for p in sys-devel/gcc:6.4.0 sys-devel/binutils sys-libs/glibc; do > emerge -1 $p || break > done Is gcc-config/binutils-config needed in this sequence as well?

Re: [gentoo-dev] pkg_rm_pretend?

On 10/11/2017 12:20 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > TL;DR: It would be very nice if when I did: > > emerge --depclean -va > > That important packages like say, Postgres could go "hey, that's ... > probably gonna break things, you haven't migrated, are you sure?" > This might also scratch the itch

[gentoo-dev] pkg_rm_pretend?

TL;DR: It would be very nice if when I did: emerge --depclean -va That important packages like say, Postgres could go "hey, that's ... probably gonna break things, you haven't migrated, are you sure?" Seeing notices *after* removing postgres that my system is now broken is not too

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-wm/echinus

Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: x11-wm/echinus after retirement of the proxied maintainer. Upstream did not release a version after 2011. http://plhk.ru/ A bump from EAPI=4 to EAPI=6 would be nice, if the package is still usefull. -- Best, Jonas

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: dev-python/python-gudev

Ühel kenal päeval, K, 11.10.2017 kell 00:36, kirjutas Jonas Stein: > Dear all, > > The following packages are up for grabs: > > dev-python/python-gudev > > after retirement of the proxied maintainer. > > The ebuild has QA warnings: >   inherit.deprecated1 >    

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC v2: news item for the 17.0 profiles

On 2017-10-10 21:16, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > … > Switching involves the following steps: > If not already done, > * Use gcc-config to select gcc-6.4.0 (or later) as system compiler > * Re-source /etc/profile: > . /etc/profile > * Re-emerge libtool Should probably instruct users to upgrade