Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v5] file_copy: use sendfile return value to measure bytes copied (bug 635126)

On 11/01/2017 09:31 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:41:37 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> The sendfile *offset parameter refers to the input file offest, so >> it cannot be used in the same way as the copy_file_range *off_out >> parameter. Therefore, add

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v5] file_copy: use sendfile return value to measure bytes copied (bug 635126)

On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 11:41:37 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > The sendfile *offset parameter refers to the input file offest, so > it cannot be used in the same way as the copy_file_range *off_out > parameter. Therefore, add sf_wrapper function which implements the > *off_out

Re: [gentoo-dev] [v1.0.2] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017, 09:44:09 CET schrieb Michał Górny: > Hi, > > Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been > discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL > and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [v1.0.2] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:44:09AM +0100, Micha?? Górny wrote > All that said, if we really have a problem that needs solving here, I'm > not convinced MISC is the right solution for it. If people need to > explicitly exclude stuff, then I suppose the configuration-injected > ignore list is much

Re: [gentoo-dev] [v1.0.2] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files

Hi, Ok, so before we get into this deeper, here's another option we've been discussing. Let's drop the non-strict mode entirely, drop OPTIONAL and keep MISC as deprecated-used-to-have-special-meaning alias to DATA. This is going to make a lot of things simpler, and avoid having the very long