Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On 04/27/2018 11:43 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:18 PM Zac Medico wrote: > >> Actually, if things like sys-apps/s6 or sys-process/runit remain as >> choices for virtual/init, this isn't going to solve the problem of >> sys-apps/sysvinit being removed by

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:18 PM Zac Medico wrote: > Actually, if things like sys-apps/s6 or sys-process/runit remain as > choices for virtual/init, this isn't going to solve the problem of > sys-apps/sysvinit being removed by emerge --depclean. In fact, if > virtual/init is

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On 04/27/2018 08:45 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 >>> Zac Medico wrote: >>> emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:28 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:28:43PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:45 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >> > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> >> On

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:28:43PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:45 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > >> On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > >> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 11:45 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >> > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 >> > Zac Medico wrote: >> > >> >> emerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On 04/27/2018 08:43 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El vie, 27-04-2018 a las 00:48 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: >> On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 >>> Zac Medico wrote: >>> emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On 04/27/2018 08:45 AM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: >> On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 >>> Zac Medico wrote: >>> emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system.

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 12:48:09AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: > On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 > > Zac Medico wrote: > > > >> emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system. Just say-in. > > > > And depclean being very

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

El vie, 27-04-2018 a las 00:48 -0700, Zac Medico escribió: > On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 > > Zac Medico wrote: > > > > > emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system. Just say-in. > > > > And depclean being very

[gentoo-dev] Please do not add maintainers without their consent

Hi, TL;DR: please do not add others as maintainers of your packages without asking them first. For example, please stop adding python@ to anything that remotely looks like Python without consent of Python project. The Python team is currently maintaining over 1200 packages. Many of those

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On 04/26/2018 11:34 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system. Just say-in. > > And depclean being very verbose doesn't do many favours here either. > > ( I regularly do >500

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] toolchain.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

On 4/27/18 2:31 AM, Matt Turner wrote: > --- > eclass/toolchain.eclass | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass > index 2da455ad4e3b..df76dc4feb8c 100644 > --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass > +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: virtual/init for init process

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 13:35:15 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > emerge --depclean, resulting in an unbootable system. Just say-in. And depclean being very verbose doesn't do many favours here either. ( I regularly do >500 package depcleans and spotting things that aren't meant to

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] kde4-base.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

--- eclass/kde4-base.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/kde4-base.eclass b/eclass/kde4-base.eclass index 8abade2677d4..72e4fcfe526b 100644 --- a/eclass/kde4-base.eclass +++ b/eclass/kde4-base.eclass @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ kdedepend="

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] toolchain.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

--- eclass/toolchain.eclass | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass index 2da455ad4e3b..df76dc4feb8c 100644 --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass +++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass @@ -206,11 +206,10 @@ DEPEND="${RDEPEND} if

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] xorg-2.eclass: Fix typo'd DRI_COMMON_DEPEND

--- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index 96a469163cfd..0329a7aa623a 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ case ${XORG_DRI} in IUSE+="

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] xorg-2.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

DRI_DEPEND can go away since all xf86-video-* drivers now directly depend on x11-base/xorg-proto, which includes the dependencies from DRI_DEPEND. --- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass