> On 31 Mar 2021, at 10:09, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 31 Mar 2021, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
>
>> setup-allowed-flags() {
>> +[[ ${EAPI} == [0-7] ]] ||
>> +die "Internal function ${FUNCNAME} is not available in
>> >=EAPI-8."
>> +_setup-allowed-flags
>> +}
>
llvm-libunwind - Use sys-libs/llvm-libunwind instead of sys-libs/libunwind
This would be similar to graphicsmagick and libressl USE flags.
sys-libs/libunwind and sys-libs/llvm-libunwind are ABI-incompatible,
at least due to different sonames of libraries. Switching between them
requires
> On Thu, 01 Apr 2021, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> +# @FUNCTION: test-flag-PROG
> +# @USAGE:
> +# @INTERNAL
> +# @DESCRIPTION:
> +# Returns shell true if is supported by given ,
> +# else returns shell false.
> test-flag-PROG() {
> + [[ ${EAPI} == [5-7] ]] ||
> + die
On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:02:15 +0200
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> From af002023d6b8f9a9e51fc31c8c25d48012e35ddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Sturmlechner
> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:04:50 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 5/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Fix eclassdoc
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas
On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 12:01:24 +0200
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> From 797d26ad9fe861c9c332f54a0f856a17af32ee53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Sturmlechner
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:29:55 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 4/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make test-flags-PROG() internal
>
>
On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:59:48 +0200
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> From 7b063ec3f4e2a76c43cd5de8a81a0a30c0f87a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Sturmlechner
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:27:27 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 3/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make test-flag-PROG() internal
>
>
On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:58:07 +0200
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> From 6d1c665d06186dde5361905d5fb2057e044b040e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Sturmlechner
> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:22:12 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make setup-allowed-flags() internal
>
>
On Thu, 01 Apr 2021 11:57:01 +0200
Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> From 0bdac63ac30fdbe2d1293d0ecbdbc2a5ea673112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Sturmlechner
> Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:41:32 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 5,6,7; drop eutils,
>
On Mittwoch, 31. März 2021 12:03:33 CEST Wolfgang E. Sanyer wrote:
> I'm curious - why the split e.g. test-flag-PROG() and _test-flag-PROG()? Is
> this stylistic, or does it serve a functional purpose? (Hah, "functional",
> get it? Because they're functions?!?
We prepend `_` to signify internal
>From af002023d6b8f9a9e51fc31c8c25d48012e35ddf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Sturmlechner
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 15:04:50 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 5/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Fix eclassdoc
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass | 15 ++-
1 file
>From 797d26ad9fe861c9c332f54a0f856a17af32ee53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Sturmlechner
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:29:55 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make test-flags-PROG() internal
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass | 28
>From 7b063ec3f4e2a76c43cd5de8a81a0a30c0f87a6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Sturmlechner
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:27:27 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make test-flag-PROG() internal
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass | 28
>From 6d1c665d06186dde5361905d5fb2057e044b040e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Sturmlechner
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 00:22:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: Make setup-allowed-flags() internal
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/flag-o-matic.eclass | 16
>From 0bdac63ac30fdbe2d1293d0ecbdbc2a5ea673112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Sturmlechner
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2021 11:41:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] flag-o-matic.eclass: SUPPORTED_EAPIS: 5,6,7; drop eutils,
multilib
- eutils was only used for eqawarn in old EAPI
- multilib usage
On 2021-03-30 Tue 02:18, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> So yes, maybe we should have a separate spec for forward-compatible
> repository features that are independent of EAPI. But I think that
> incompatible changes won't be possible there and would have to reamin
> in PMS. (For example, updating of
15 matches
Mail list logo
