Florian Schmaus writes:
> Hi Sam,
>
> thanks for your feedback. I am glad for everyone who engages in this
> discussion and shares their views and new information.
>
> On 24/04/2023 22.28, Sam James wrote:
>> Florian Schmaus writes:
>> [CCing williamh@ as go-module.eclass & dev-lang/go
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 3:31 PM Andrew Ammerlaan
wrote:
>
> On 26/04/2023 18:12, Matt Turner wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:31 AM Florian Schmaus wrote:
> >> The discussion would be more productive if someone who is supporting the
> >> EGO_SUM deprecation could rationally summarize the
# Matt Turner (2023-04-26)
# Package contains only a script that runs an X application on a remote system
# with rsh (use ssh -Y instead), and two scripts that were probably used for
# converting the old BDF fonts to XLFD names back in the early 90's. None of
# these are useful today.
# Removal
> This way ridiculously large manifests are gone out of ::gentoo. But overlays
> can
> still use the EGO_SUM method for their go packages if a tarball is too much of
> a hassle. And everyone is happy. It is then the responsibility of the overlay
> maintainers to ensure that their manifests don't
On 26/04/2023 18:12, Matt Turner wrote:
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:31 AM Florian Schmaus wrote:
The discussion would be more productive if someone who is supporting the
EGO_SUM deprecation could rationally summarize the main arguments why we
deprecated EGO_SUM.
You're requesting the changes.
# Merged into net-libs/ldns. Bug 828109.
# Removal on 2023-05-26.
net-dns/ldns-utils
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 11:31 AM Florian Schmaus wrote:
> The discussion would be more productive if someone who is supporting the
> EGO_SUM deprecation could rationally summarize the main arguments why we
> deprecated EGO_SUM.
You're requesting the changes. It's on you to read the previous
Hi Sam,
thanks for your feedback. I am glad for everyone who engages in this
discussion and shares their views and new information.
On 24/04/2023 22.28, Sam James wrote:
Florian Schmaus writes:
[CCing williamh@ as go-module.eclass & dev-lang/go maintainer.]
I like to ask the Gentoo
On 2023-04-25 16:09, Maciej Barć wrote:
> You would also have to have correct permissions on cache dirs
> (root:portage or portage:portage) this also means that the cache dir
> will have to be set during build explicitly.
> Do both Nim and Go support setting it?
Yes. For Nim it would be
