Eli Schwartz writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> On 2/9/24 2:57 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> One example I know off the top of my head is dev-lang/php where
>> USE=ipv6 isn't entirely about ipv6 connectivity (although it does do
>> that). It also augments some of the user-facing PHP
Michael Orlitzky writes:
> On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 14:09 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>>
>> Asking out of genuine ignorance: what kind of direct behavioral changes
>> occur as a result of setting or unsetting USE=ipv6.
>
> One example I know off the top of my head is dev-lang/php where
> USE=ipv6
On 10/2/24 08:56, stefan1 wrote:
> Both removals definitely not still being contested and debated.
You've conveniently ignored the context immediately below the line that
you chose to quote and somehow decided to try and shoehorn in discussion
of a completely different (and settled) issue.
Andrey Grozin writes:
> Hello *,
>
> pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl:
>
> UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag
> without effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]
>
> The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has nothing to do with
> installing /
Michał Górny writes:
> See-Also: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923228
> See-Also: https://bugs.gentoo.org/880671
s/See-Also/Bug/.
LGTM otherwise. Thanks for working on this, it's a great improvement.
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/821955
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919150
> Signed-off-by:
On 2024-02-09 21:56, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 2/9/24 4:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
This is the part where you try to convince me that the things I want
are stupid. OK. I don't care. I want it off. Leave me alone :)
As evidenced by the removal of libressl and eudev, this logic is
fallacious
On 2/9/24 4:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> This is the part where you try to convince me that the things I want
> are stupid. OK. I don't care. I want it off. Leave me alone :)
As evidenced by the removal of libressl and eudev, this logic is
fallacious and wrong and not the way Gentoo is
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 16:04 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> Counterpoint: some PHP program out there is probably vulnerable because
> it tried to validate an ipv6 address and could not distinguish between
> "it's okay" and "idk if it's okay, the function you called does not
> exist" (because php
On 2/9/24 2:57 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> One example I know off the top of my head is dev-lang/php where
> USE=ipv6 isn't entirely about ipv6 connectivity (although it does do
> that). It also augments some of the user-facing PHP language functions
> with ipv6 support. Having them enabled is
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 14:09 -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote:
>
> Asking out of genuine ignorance: what kind of direct behavioral changes
> occur as a result of setting or unsetting USE=ipv6.
One example I know off the top of my head is dev-lang/php where
USE=ipv6 isn't entirely about ipv6 connectivity
On 2/9/24 12:17 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> USE=unicode and USE=ipv6 are different beasts. In many cases they
> directly and immediately change the behavior of the package. I think
> that there are good reasons to want those two disabled, but the user's
> reasoning shouldn't really matter. The
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 12:17 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 11:57 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > Based on this pkgcheck issue, this originates from a decision from by
> > Gentoo QA team.
> >
> > https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgcheck/issues/414#issuecomment-1213057268
> >
>
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 11:57 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> Based on this pkgcheck issue, this originates from a decision from by
> Gentoo QA team.
>
> https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgcheck/issues/414#issuecomment-1213057268
>
Thanks for the dig. I agree with the reasoning for things like
See-Also: https://bugs.gentoo.org/923228
See-Also: https://bugs.gentoo.org/880671
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/821955
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919150
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/llvm-r1.eclass | 250
eclass/tests/llvm-r1.sh | 151
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 11:07 AM Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> >
> > Is there even any reason to ever disable unicode support? Point is that
> > why have USE for it? Or does it introduce additional dependencies?
>
> Being able to disable
From a06fd4447d34febaa2cca449c8f6979b91a2818e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:41:30 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: install vmlinu{x,z} symlink
and also link generic initrd/uki.efi
Signed-off-by: Andrew Ammerlaan
---
From 3d3c073f932caa307c26f8cf17b061a609433fce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 13:28:02 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: install vmlinu{x,z} symlink
Some other distributions install (a symlink to) the kernel
image here. Tools such as
On Fri, 2024-02-09 at 10:54 -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>
> Is there even any reason to ever disable unicode support? Point is that
> why have USE for it? Or does it introduce additional dependencies?
Being able to disable things like this is one of the few reasons why
people choose Gentoo.
On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 03:23:10PM +, Andrey Grozin wrote:
> Hello *,
>
> pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl:
>
> UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without
> effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]
>
> The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl
On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 10:23 AM Andrey Grozin
wrote:
>
> Hello *,
>
> pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl:
>
> UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without
> effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]
>
> The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has
Hello *,
pkgcheck complains about each new version of dev-lisp/sbcl:
UseFlagWithoutDeps: version 2.4.1: special small-files USE flag without
effect on dependencies: [ unicode ]
The USE flag "unicode" in the sbcl ebuild has nothing to do with
installing / not installing any files, small or
21 matches
Mail list logo
