On 02/04/2024 20:46, Eli Schwartz wrote:
On 4/2/24 4:43 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
Well, they change one thing. It's hard for the security professionals at
work to deal with things when they are constantly having to respond to the
three-ring circus.
This is a complaint I hear very often from
On 4/2/24 4:43 AM, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>> Well, they change one thing. It's hard for the security professionals at
>> work to deal with things when they are constantly having to respond to the
>> three-ring circus.
>
> This is a complaint I hear very often from the people working at the heart
>
On 01/04/2024 15:56, Azamat Hackimov wrote:
There is no problem in the XZ/LZMA format itself as the reference
algorithm is not compromised. It's all about trust between developers
of application and developers of distribution. If you lost trust to
xz-utils's developers, you may use alternatives
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2024, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> + # If we are updating this package, then there is no need to update
> + # the tlpdb in postrm, as it will be again updated in postinst.
> + [[ -n ${REPLACING_VERSIONS} && ${EBUILD_PHASE} == postrm ]] && return
Sorry for having
Update (or create) the tlpdb based on the contents of
/usr/share/tlpkg/tlpobj.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/928162
Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus
---
eclass/texlive-module.eclass | 57
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
diff --git
Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus
---
eclass/texlive-module.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/texlive-module.eclass b/eclass/texlive-module.eclass
index 9fc4e619ff9b..d19e02f02647 100644
--- a/eclass/texlive-module.eclass
+++
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-04-01 at 08:57 +0100, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
>> I stand by and reiterate my view that there is far too much of a
>> cavalier attitude towards the matter in general out there including here
>> in Gentoo. But not in particular here, it is everywhere where this is
OK, I said I was done and this is a waste of time for everyone, but if
people want to keep the discussion going I'll bite :-)
Eli Schwartz wrote:
> But also, please keep in mind that 98% of all people on the internet can
> do whatever they want and it simply doesn't matter. They are public
>
On 1.4.2024 23.07, James Le Cuirot wrote:
>
> That's not stupid at all, I'd been thinking exactly the same thing. I raised
> this whole issue during a discussion at FOSDEM 2019, where I admitted that I
> didn't check the code changes for packages I was bumping, knowing that few to
> none of the
