-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 06:22, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in
>> portage tree.
>
> Wait, what? If you're not even in
Isn't this the same situation with gcc stabilizations? Once the
timeframe for fixing broken packages with e.g gcc-4.5 is passed, the
remaining broken packages will be gone.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
this case) everything else. If the folks
> want the package in the tree they can fix it; thats the whole point
> of masking (providing a notification and a fix-it interval.)
This is why the packages is masked now. But of course people don't
bother reading masking messages and they think that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 08:21, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> On 10/11/11 06:22, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras
>>> wrote:
>&g
o system@ set cause you
all seem to love this package very very much). I am done with this
thread since you all enjoy spreading flame bites around without even
spending 1' to read the bug.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIG
rds,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJOlHTEAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LC2VYP/j/Pt5/0CDTRgnRgjlYeXDgj
zTnvKdOjVLo7sksQUnWXvs1/Cs26dA4woHCUkBKhWYzyYtHtD70dBPomTQyHeSJr
IisH/WmoQK0xKoMZW3IhtnsSQ5rGKRg6dw0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 18:34, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Markos Chandras
> wrote:
I understand your points but given the fact that we have no active QA
team to pick up the mess whenever needed (Diego can't do eveyryt
ts in here twice, I used an incorrect account.
>
>
Maybe you want the --with-bdeps parameter along with the -D one?. man
emerge -> section Options -> parameter -D
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/11/11 21:01, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> On Dienstag 11 Oktober 2011 20:23:13 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/11/11 18:34, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Markos Chandras
>>
>>> w
d be no problem with us borrowing back from Alpine.
>
This is a joke right? All the desktop "infrastructure" depends on
that. Are you suggesting to make Gentoo an embedded/server only distro?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/12/11 02:44, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 17:52:42 +0100 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> Seems like none of you ever bothered to read the bug about
>> pngcrush and what was discussed there. It is getting a lit
s once you identify the broken .la files? Should people
delete these .la files? Should they just rebuild the package? Should
they run lafilefixer? I think you need to add some bits here on how to
deal with the remaining .la files ;)
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID:
On 10/16/11 11:32, Torsten Veller wrote:
* "Markos Chandras (hwoarang)":
Log:
add note about default comment in bugs. Add template
+Bugs assigned to maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org
+
+Developers who participate in this project should encourage users to participate in this pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (16 Oct 2011)
# Multiple open bugs (375071, 256850, 214192, 202497)
# No maintainer. Removal in 30 days
app-admin/mon
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (16 Oct 2011)
# Runtime problems which makes it pretty much useless
# Bug #246264. No maintainer. Removal in 30 days
app-admin/stow
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP
On 10/16/11 11:54, Torsten Veller wrote:
* Markos Chandras:
However, a comment draws more attention than a bugzilla
note.
That's exactly the problem for watchers of maintainer-needed or -wanted.
Every mail draws some attention.
Anyway I can /dev/null those mails. Just need to create an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (16 Oct 2011)
# No maintainer. Does not build. Open bugs 382375 and
# 326975. Removal in 30 days
app-misc/dnetc
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (16 Oct 2011)
# Does not build with newer kernels. Open bug for version bump
# but newer version does not seem to build as well.
# No maintainer. Removal in 30 days.
sys-fs/cowloop
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux
nsure that their packages work with portage eclasses or they can have
their own eclasses locally.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBC
>
>
There is always the problem with abandoned (but working) packages
which may have no commits in > 2 years. We'll end up with empty
ChangeLogs.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/12/2011 11:40 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> devs are not the normal case. it's trivial to have them use
> --quiet-build=n in their default emerge opts. -mike
Or add --quiet-build=n to dev/ profiles.
- --
Regards,
Markos Cha
rst version of portage
> to support this option was released in like ~Mar 2011. -mike
Yeah but can't we just assume devs have recent versions of portage? I
can't imagine a dev using a 6-month old portage :-/
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (13 Nov 2011)
# Fails to link with gold linker. Uses tempnam instead
# of mkstemp which is a fatal error in recent gcc versions
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #371451
games-mud/kmuddy
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo
re-0.7.7.ebuild Log: pull in 0.7.7.1
> with another fix (metadata); punt older versions that have known
> misbehaviours
>
> (Portage version: 2.1.10.39/cvs/Linux x86_64)
>
Why did you erase the entire Changelog?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4A
s all
> possible ABIs and have people install that first. then they should
> be able to install gcc/linux- headers freely and rebuild glibc
> after that. -mike
Do you have such a glibc binary around?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEG
use case will be for them to set
> MULTILIB_ABIS in their make.conf:
> /etc/make.conf:MULTILIB_ABIS="x32" -mike
What happens if all three ABIS are set in MULTILIB_ABIS? What would be
the default ABI for compiled binaries?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Develope
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/08/2011 09:34 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 08 December 2011 16:29:15 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 12/08/2011 09:22 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> the releases will include all 3 ABIs (which only affects
>>
ical that force you to keep them in the ~testing tree?
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJO66sGAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCSH0QAIKc26at3BPsEauv1Wk/6hir
lfrFv0BEDgIUHwi4vFQT6xUT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/17/2011 09:34 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> 2011/12/16 Markos Chandras :
>> On 12/12/2011 05:44 PM, Tomas Chvatal (scarabeus) wrote:
>>> scarabeus11/12/12 17:44:48
>>>
>>> Modified: Change
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/17/2011 08:32 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 20:33:11 +0000 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>> to avoid useless compilations to slow machines
>
> That's a package manager issue, not an ebuild issue.
&
len
>
I agree. Advanced portage features can be in Gentoo Handbook provided
it is clear that they should be not used without proper and complete
understanding
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/13/2012 10:35 PM, Ulrich Mueller (ulm) wrote:
> Don't set PROPERTIES=interactive, bug 398809.
Please do not forget to update the ChangeLog file.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-B
een that before!
>
> Same here. How about adding some warning to portage (maybe just in
> the developer profile) when files in NEEDED are provided by
> packages not in RDEPEND?
>
Interesting idea. I agree this has to be only in dev profile for now
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandra
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPGb5cAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCMpgP/0bLsxFxCKFbYoE5B3BYPeqi
i3zCZEet0mBKHcpGZPSIs1jA1TQxVKS9JwNbcEdGKsN5Y4/xtsgWL5GXmIHw/A6n
fOQBfBw9vst00i7qd5GY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (21 Jan 2012)
# Package renamed to media-sound/musique
# http://flavio.tordini.org/minitunes-renamed-to-musique
# Removal in 30 days
media-sound/minitunes
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/21/2012 05:04 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 1/21/12 5:45 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>> # Markos Chandras (21 Jan 2012) # Package
>>>
am or a
flamebait. Try to avoid (unnecessary) flames :)
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPGyZ2AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCFosP/1LWCSXF+ih4rp5QNHcYH+UA
bWbBZox7hQHX
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/21/2012 08:33 PM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 21.01.2012 20:08, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 01/21/2012 05:04 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
>>> On 1/21/12 5:45 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>>> On Sat,
maintainers could fix things up bit by bit,
> without having to burden you alone with tinderbox troubles.
This actually sounds a great idea. It probably worth opening a feature
request for portage using our bugzilla.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
these people who have long standing devaways are not
participating on our lists therefore these threads ends up in /dev/null.
[1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=338829
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
laptop.
>
> Are you sure this is actually still needed? The download link leads
> to the page of tp_smapi, which is a separate Gentoo package...
>
Yeah afaik tp_smapi is a replacement. The app-laptop/thinkpad needs to
be treecleaned.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (02 Feb 2012)
# Multiple security bugs: 284356, 341085, 369137, 384243, 401993
# No maintainer. Removal in 30 days
www-apps/twiki
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (02 Feb 2012)
# Multiple security bugs: 284356, 341085, 369137, 384243, 401993
# No maintainer. Removal in 30 days
www-apps/twiki
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
probably don't care so keeping it off the radar is
acceptable for them.
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPKxp3AAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCAs4P+gNxP945sbobxamzR/Bq9A9z
Vub/J9fLz1yTtCcwshonsAFV
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (04 Feb 2012)
# No maintainer. Functionality is now embedded in portage
# Bug #398935. Removal in 30 days
app-portage/autounmask
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (04 Feb 2012)
# Dead upstream
# Bug #276412. Removal in 30 days
sys-kernel/kerneloops
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux
changes if I've already made them?
>
> Cheers, Hilco
>
I says nothing about "nettle" use flag. It says:
"Enable the *gmp* flag to the dev-libs/nettle package"
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012)
# No maintainer. Does not build. Bug #402857
# Removal in 30 days
app-emulation/libdsk
app-emulation/lib765
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012)
# Unmaintained. If you want it take and bump it
# Bug #386339
app-shells/ksh
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (10 Feb 2012)
# Unmaintained. Does not build with recent kernels. Bug #381263
# Replacement: app-laptop/tp_smapi
# Removal in 30 days
app-laptop/thinkpad
app-laptop/tpctl
app-laptop/configure-thinkpad
Regards,
Markos Chandras
own to
> software keyworded for non-x86 and non-amd64?
>
> Thanks!
>
> [1]:
>
AFAIK features/64bit-native is for other 64-bit arches too like ia64
and ppc64. So we can't really drop this. And we can't drop the
per-arch 64bit file because if a package does not work on i
m/kadu
net-irc/quassel
net-misc/remmina
net-news/liferea
net-p2p/transmission
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJPN5gZAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCGuQP/jcLMbRNhcIelk
standard syntax. You can't use
for that to extract the real package name because
each developer use this tag in a different way. Same for description.
The proposed tag would have a single strict syntax, that is a single
string just for the real package name so it would be easily
extracta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/14/2012 06:17 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 10:44:41 +0000 Markos Chandras
> wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up. There are more than 5 packages using the
>> 'ayatana' use flag so I will add it to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (19 Feb 2012)
# Illegal license. Bug #390205
# Removal in 30 days
app-text/notecase-pro
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Developer / Key ID: B4AFF2C2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux
cludes patches >20kb
>
Gentoo devs are supposed to put patches, tarballs and whatever they
want in their space. This is the recommended policy documented in
devmanual as well
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/mirrors/index.html
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras / Gentoo Linux Develope
rsions *prior* to 2.19-r1 at this point.
>
> If we do, that makes it easy to fix bug 478764 [1], because there
> would only be three versions of glibc we have to worry about.
>
> thoughts?
>
> William
>
> [1] http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
# Markos Chandras (23 Dec 2014)
# Homepage returns 404 which probably suggests upstream has vanished.
# Superseded by app-text/dos2unix. Bug #533222
app-misc/fixdos
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
urbing.
>
> Best regards, Andrew Savchenko
>
we are having the same discussion every couple of months. It should
have been a clue that such issues are not meant to be solved in the
list since we tend to drive everything off-topic in the end.
spending half an hour tweaking it.
imho, in this particular case, the old behavior is fine by me and it's
what has been around for a long time. If that's not clear, or causes
confusing, perhaps it would be best to document the use flags in a
better way and deal with it.
- --
iki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Gentoo/Staffing_Needs/Vmware_developer
which is nice :)
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJU32TmAAoJEPqDWhW0r/LCElQP/AyxKrLPXFFAxf81V5dB5SIB
PItGeMu0FQrmQcKJ+0Phsr1UJTlkWqLghNOyEYU7sfcstfMKV
> herd email, or directly to you?
>
>
You don't have to participate to the discussions in the mailing lists
:) You can just contribute code! Even a single patch a month or so is
better than nothing
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/15/15 01:55, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 02/14/2015 06:38 PM, Christopher Head wrote:
>> On Sat, 14 Feb 2015 21:49:56 +0200 Markos Chandras
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You don't have to participate to the discussi
mmit you should at
least drop him an email to let him know. How else do you expect him to
know he did something wrong? I am a bit worried QA is taking such
actions without communicating that with the developer. If you don't
let people know they do mistakes, it's likely they will do them agai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/16/15 13:53, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 02/16/2015 12:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>
>
>> I too believe that if you are reverting someone's commit you
>> should at least drop him an email to let him know.
because he/she uses that to prove that QA is
dying, Gentoo is a zombie, cvs sucks and elephants could fly.
So how about we stop replying to such flamebaits for a change? That
would really improve the quality of our lists and people wanting to
start a flame will see that this is no longer the plac
the same discussion.
The original changelog discussion is here
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_c3436497e445eaf86deea08772e5.xml
There were no objections so we started using it
http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_72fafb93225c9f5559415356eb093f44.xml
Can we please bookma
done by a JIT in the kernel itself. if the kernel
> lacks support for seccomp, daemons generally should fallback at
> runtime. if they don't, people should file bugs to get them
> fixed. -mike
>
Yes please
- --
Regards,
Markos Chandras
-BEGIN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/22/2015 08:41 AM, Ben de Groot (yngwin) wrote:
> yngwin 15/02/22 06:41:41
>
> Added:libertine-4.7.5.ebuild
> libertine-5.1.3.20110615.ebuild metadata.xml ChangeLog
> libertine-5.3.0.20120702.ebuild Log: Move from libertin
p;estimated_time=&flag_type-4=X&form_name=enter_bug&keywords=&maketemplate=Remember%20values%20as%20bookmarkable%20template&op_sys=Linux&priority=Normal&product=Websites&rep_platform=All&requestee_type-4=&short_desc=archives.gentoo.org%3A%20FILL%20IN%20HERE&version=n%2Fa
>
>
Excellent! Looks great. Thank you very much for your hard work
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ks pretty good
One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access to the
repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a repository for
rw access. Is there a way to generate such urls on the web interface?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 03/04/2015 02:56 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:57:40PM +0200, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> One that that I miss though is the git (+ssh) links for rw access
>> to the repositories. It's not obvious what url to use to clone a
>> repository for rw
back to whatever makes more sense to them. Would it
be terribly difficult to set a template in the "Summary" field whenever
the "Keywording and Stabilization" component is selected when filing a bug?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
? because that does seem to be something
portage-internal specific in the way it handles changes in {,R}DEPEND
without revbumps. Where is this thing documented in the first place?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
not understand 100% what you are trying to say but why not add
gnu_andrew to the java mail alias on pecker? how is metadata.xml going
to solve this problem?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
ing leaving the
>> Gentoo organisation on Github altogether since it's basically useless
>> (for reasons such as the one you mentioned) and since we have our own
>> bug tracker already.
>
> Well, that shouldn't really hurt as most of our users already know th
utils
sys-apps/shadow
sys-apps/systemd
sys-freebsd/freebsd-ubin
sys-freebsd/freebsd-usbin
sys-libs/pam
(+ lightdm which I just committed)
How about making it global with the following description?
"Enable support for sys-process/audit"
which is similar to what most packages use?
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The following packages currently use the 'audit' local useflag
>>
>> ~$ qgrep -N -s -l -e "^IUSE.*audit"
On 10/06/2015 10:29 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 19:39:42 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>> On 10/06/2015 06:58 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 17:32:07 +0100 Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>&
t;
> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=540540
> [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525674
>
fwiw, it sounds good to me
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
On 11/04/2015 05:37 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On 11/04/2015 11:34 AM, lejonet wrote:
>> Hi gentoo-dev,
>>
>> I recently had a bout with sudo and sssd, and found that the problem was that
>> sudo wasn't sssd aware and the reason we don't have a USE-flag for
al information on the timeline.
>
> +1
>
> You said it better than I could have.
>
> Ulrich
>
yeah, +1 on that too. I am not too bothered with the name to be honest.
However, using 'ChangeLog' for git logs sounds like something most of us
and users are familiar with already so that should work.
--
Regards,
Markos Chandras
701 - 782 of 782 matches
Mail list logo
