On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
When we then move onto stage 2, it uses just the packages built during
stage1 (/tmp/stage1root becomes /). This means, if seed stage has
mpc.so.0.1 but portage has since included mpc.so.2 that the gcc in
stage2
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
Yes, it does need to be rebuilt if key deps are updated. The gcc
produced in the stage1 is broken, so won't run to rebuild itself during
the stage2 run.
But we keep the old libs around via preserve_libs, and once stage1 is
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
You are misremembering that we are using preserve_libs to save our butts
when mpc is updated and gcc is still linked to the old mpc. I feel very
uncomfortable as the recommendation of preserve-libs is to remerge
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
Perhaps this was covered already, but how exactly did this one file,
added by your co-maintainer, hurt you? Did it cause additional bugs?
Did it break a working ebuild? Did it kill your cat?
It would seem to
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
[...]
...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc?
all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:59:57 +0200
yac y...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
I was recently investigating what cpu flags do I have and how does it
work. I have put what I have so far at [1].
So I thought I let you know in case
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Steven, I think you can behave a lot better on the internet. kthx.
Amazing. I came to the exact opposite conclusion.
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
bad with
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with
the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone.
Interesting
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same
discussion again?
Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it
could have bugs in the future?? Tree cleaning packages over
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
In terms of 'following Gentoo policy.' We encourage packages to be as
close to upstream as possible. I cannot fathom why when you basically
find a performance bug in malloc, you start a thread on the list about
replacing
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 11:44:31 Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I see a *HUGE* reason. glibc ships with ptmalloc. If you think they
should use
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:03:01 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open
bugs
blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
This makes reading them a bit easier, especially with phases run
in parallel.
---
gx86/eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 7 ---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
+ 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org profiles.desc:
+ Mark s390 profiles stable.
+
06 Jan 2013; Justin
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear Everyone,
Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following
architectures that is willing to help ZFS development?
Alpha
HPPA
IA-64
MIPS/MIPS64
PPC/PPC64
SH
SPARC/SPARC64
I want to port
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
5. Solutions to specific problems
-
1. x11-proto packages
Those packages install headers to /usr/include and pkg-config files
to /usr/lib64. This supposedly means that the headers could be
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you want to re-implement multilib-portage in an eclass without the
additional benefits a package-manager level implementation has?
I really wish you'd just make the PMS diff and get your stuff
implemented. How long has it
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina
zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote:
net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017
be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally.
That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open
stabilization bugs for their packages.
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually
missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a
lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails
that I have to search through.
So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default
implementation from freedesktop.org.
pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the
switch from bundled glib1 to glib2
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
All packages should have local descriptions of what the bindist
USE-flag specifically does. This should be a policy when writing
ebuilds that include it.
Agreed.
media-libs/mesa
Fixed. (bug 448932)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and
apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're
aware of this.
Someone said on IRC this morning in response to this thread
the tragic thing
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers
that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity
packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still
contributing to the
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Do you realize that you just wrote a two-and-a-half page single-spaced
thousand-word email? Seriously, this is way too much. This mailing
list is way too much.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421839
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445848
I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up.
This has been setup (with Donnie's help):
https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Richard Yao posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:35:22 -0500 as excerpted:
Having a builtin is a good idea, but the implementation as a mandatory
dependency on kmod is not. The plan is to reintroduce it as an
optional dependency,
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/18/2012 11:59 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
All I'm asking is some kind of coherent mission statement.
How can we define a mission statement when we are still in the process
of understanding the codebase, what it does
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
As I posted elsewhere, working on a project based on hate only lasts
so long. I should know, that's the reason I started udev in the first
place over 9 years ago.
The Xfree86 people generated a lot of hate, just
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install
media be replaced with
pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd
involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300
Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200
Michał Górny
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote:
I think this means make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64
not use the emul- packages? If so, that'd certainly be a component of
getting rid of emul-linux-x86
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:02 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround.
And I'd prefer if people who aren't involved with what I'm working on
don't try to block my progress.
I appreciate your opinion, and truthfully I'd just rather
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Matt Turner schrieb:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
Thanks
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
One problem that I remembered now:
If every ebuild inheritting this eclass (either this one or similar)
will add a multilib USE, people running multilib profiles will get it
enabled for ALL packages inheritting it, causing
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build
packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported.
Thanks a lot, Michał! This looks good to me.
Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt.
So the idea is
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò
flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote:
On 22/09/2012 18:54, Matt Turner wrote:
I'd like to add multilib USE flags to Mesa and thus its dependencies.
I realized that almost everything in x11-libs/ could be converted very
easily, which would allow us
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
Readability is more important, and there I still don't buy the
argument that the new
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Matt Turner wrote:
From the other thread (example conversion of gentoo-x86 current
deps to unified dependencies):
[Sorry, I've missed this one in the other thread, so replying here.]
4
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 14:01, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
1) 746 hits in the tree for COMMON_DEPEND; that's 2%, and the usages
I'm aware of have been for literally, what it sounds like- depends
that are both DEPEND and RDEPEND.
CDEPEND is pretty common as well. I could 466 files
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Since DEPENDENCIES hasn't been written up in a Gentoo-friendly manner,
and since the Exherbo documentation doesn't seem to suffice to explain
the idea here, here's some more details on the DEPENDENCIES
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Several packages are using it with the same sense (support connman),
maybe we should move it from local to global USEs, what do you think?
Off-topic question, but how is connman related to NetworkManager? Is
it an alternative,
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Matt Turner schrieb:
I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to
special-case packages that don't install binaries.
I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for
certain cases
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul-
packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips.
If a package has dependencies, then those dependencies are required to have
at least the
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS)
Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage
on *really* slow systems.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote:
I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git
Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems
and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's
good enough
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog.
I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for
some
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (05 May 2012)
# Broken with unrar-4.2.1 wrt upstream ticket of:
# http://code.google.com/p/rar2fs/issues/detail?id=10
# Either waiting for fixed release, or the package will
# be
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/26/12 at 06:00PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
Arg, no. Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2.
There's no reason to
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:
I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for
SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global..
That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without
checking for their presence,
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the
problem ?
afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2
If that works, which I think it will, that does sound like the best thing to
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo?
It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't
have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the
keywords, you'll
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dear All,
I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile
mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well.
it was masked on Apr 18, 2010,
,
| /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote:
Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0?
I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we
declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote:
On 03/28/12 03:16, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
But that's ok, because extensive studies have shown that the only possible
reasons for putting /usr/portage on its own
So you run set FEATURES=test to run a package's test suite during
keywording. Later, you emerge -vuNDa ... and portage wants to reemerge
that package with USE=-test.
Can't we avoid this somehow? I presume in the vast majority of cases
emerging with FEATURES/USE=test doesn't actually affect what's
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
slep noticed and reported an odd thing:
$ euse -i kate
...
ls: cannot access /gentoo/portage/metadata/cache/kde-base/kdebindings-perl-*:
No such file or directory
ls: cannot access
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are
preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near
stabilization)?
I have
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote:
some mips profiles are scary too:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/profiles_mips.png
Weird. I'll take a look at that.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith gaur...@gmail.com wrote:
The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which
appears to already be on. It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag for
dev-libs/nettle.
Which looks like it's on as well.
In either case -- this
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (21 Jan 2012)
# Package renamed to media-sound/musique
# http://flavio.tordini.org/minitunes-renamed-to-musique
# Removal in 30 days
media-sound/minitunes
Is it normal to wipe
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted:
On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Michael Weber wrote:
Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds?
take a chill pill phil
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Dmitrij K kdi...@live.ru wrote:
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
On Tuesday 10 of January 2012 03:34:06 Dmitrij K wrote:
Dear developers of crossdev.
Can you realize --target mingw64 (for creating windows app 64 bit) (like
mingw-w64.sourceforge.net)?
And can
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Samuli Suominen posted on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:03:41 +0200 as excerpted:
i'll add USE=neon to use.desc and punt the local descriptions if nobody
objects
media-libs/libpng: support ARM NEON cpu instruction set
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib when
necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf. so there's no need to
explicitly list zlib as part of the system target. so time to drop
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
El mié, 26-10-2011 a las 19:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió:
On 26-10-2011 19:11:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:07 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
3) one step towards
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 support in
python.eclass yet?
I understand you have some complicated patches in flight etc etc, but
are they _required_ for the eclass not to break with EAPI 4?
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Matthew Summers
quantumsumm...@gentoo.org wrote:
Its being worked on currently. There are many fairly difficult issues
to be worked through here.
That's kind of the question though. What's are the issues?
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Saturday 08 October 2011 11:07:49 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Il giorno sab, 08/10/2011 alle 11.33 +, Sven Vermeulen ha scritto:
- The fix_libtool_files.sh command is now part of the toolchain
eclass, so
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time.
by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning. having qutecom in the tree
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code
duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of find
when rm is more than enough, ...
I haven't looked, but if we don't already, a
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start
masking other people's packages?
It seems you don't even bother to read the masking message or my
comments on the bug. I said Talk to QA and CC me if you
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in portage tree.
Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start
masking other people's packages?
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Watch your language. This is not your $home playroom
And it's not your mailing list.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that's tired of your Let Me Insert
Myself Into Everything syndrome just because you're on QA. QA's a joke
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:35 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
MT == Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org writes:
MT Is that a problem with the ABI, or just that gcc-4.6 is more strict?
MT I think it's the latter.
The failure occurs at the linking stage, not the compiling stage.
Ie, ln(1
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (08 Oct 2011)
# Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127
# Removal in 14 days
14 days?
media-gfx/pngcrush
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen
ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to
compile against system libpng15
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
SV == Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org writes:
SV - Since 3.4.0/4.1.0, the C++ ABI is forward-compatible, so rebuilds
SV from that version onwards should not be needed
That is not generally true.
I use gcc-4.5 as my
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:45:02PM -0700, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I checked
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=5
and the Handbook only mentions validating MD5 checksums.
There are two
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sat
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
# Moved to dev-texlive/texlive-langarabic after TeX Live 2009
dev-texlive/texlive-langarab
Can this not just be a pkg move?
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote:
I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2
packages currently in the tree. The maintainer of zlib pushed those
revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's zlib
Often packages depending on X11 libraries will also have to specify
the X11 libraries' proto packages in DEPEND. This is because the X11
library itself #includes files provided by the proto package. It's not
really that the X11 library depends on this at run-time, so the
protocol packages aren't
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote:
Often packages depending on X11 libraries will also have to specify
the X11 libraries' proto packages in DEPEND. This is because the X11
library itself #includes files provided by the proto package. It's not
really
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
The first is more correct, I think, but it's also much more annoying.
Mesa winds up having x11-proto/inputproto in DEPEND for some long
forgotten reason, for instance.
Why is it annoying?
Because the proto will have to
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi again,
Found a little problem: it's not finding a newer version of
wireless-regdb, which uses a date-based versioning system. If euscan
tried to view/parse the directory index where the distfiles are
located, it
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
The point I was addressing is the suggestion that the above should be
possible and the idea that any single developer is entitled to do so.
It's a moot point, because no one (that I see) claimed or is
# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org (25 Aug 2011)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Use arcload instead.
sys-boot/arcboot
2011/8/25 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org:
Hello,
Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should be
published before mesa-7.11 goes stable.
Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel
dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity shout
ah, that cld workaround ?!
On Samstag 20 August 2011 20:03:04 Mike Frysinger wrote:
we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 7:21 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2011 at 01:50:42PM +0200, Raúl Porcel wrote:
With subprofiles we could keyword such packages, mask them globally on
arm and unmask it on the subprofile of the subarchitecture that supports it.
I suggest
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 11:21 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
now that yacc is no longer part of system, and we have multiple providers of
yacc, we need a virtual. so unless there are any complaints, i'll be adding
virtual/yacc which has || ( sys-devel/bison dev-util/yacc ).
once
# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org) (04 Aug 2011)
# libots is only used by Compaq's C compiler, which was tree
# cleaned years ago. Masked for removal in 30 days.
dev-libs/libots
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 2:12 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 01:48:16 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday, June 29,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:17 AM, justin j...@gentoo.org wrote:
HI,
with the addition of the fortran-2.eclass, it is possible to remove the
USE=fortran from the default profiles. Any objections?
justin
Nope, I actually suggested this back in December, and no one bothered
to respond.
Sounds
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would
it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it?
Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each
subdirectory? Some
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 6/7/11 9:53 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
Building 400~ locales is not fun on mips when building stages.
Do you have some data to quantify not fun? How long does it take?
To build glibc
- once for the n32 ABI
601 - 700 of 734 matches
Mail list logo
