On 11/28/12 15:25, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 11/27/2012 02:43 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
After discussing it at:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/262834
...
Apache itself is in need of some attention these days. The ChangeLog
shows only Patrick committing in the last six
On 11/23/12 21:17, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:45:56 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 11/20/12 21:57, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 + (UTC)
Patrick Lauer (patrick) patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
patrick 12/11/16 09:10:51
On 11/23/12 22:32, Thomas Sachau wrote:
Ian Stakenvicius schrieb:
On 22/11/12 11:22 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 08:22:10PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 11:11 Sun 18 Nov , Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Here's a list of every package where I'm a maintainer and there
On 11/20/12 21:57, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:10:51 + (UTC)
Patrick Lauer (patrick) patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
patrick 12/11/16 09:10:51
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:lyx-2.0.5.ebuild
Log:
Bump
While the bump was fine
On 11/06/12 05:45, Duncan wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:39:19 -0800 as excerpted:
On 05/11/2012 07:31, Steven J. Long wrote:
Are you really missing the fact that by testing someone's overlay, the
package would by definition not be in the tree, and you wouldn't have
On 10/17/12 06:54, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
One of the items that has come up in the Git conversion, and needs some
attention.
[snip]
As such, we've decided to make the PORTAGE_GPG_KEY strictly enforce what
was originally intended.
- You must specify a key or subkey exactly.
On 08/23/12 19:34, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
With cia.vc no longer working, its hard to keep track of one another's
commits in real time. I used to use the web page and the IRC channel
like a gitweb log to see what was going on. Any suggestions on how we
can get the visibility
On 09/07/12 19:45, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Since DEPENDENCIES hasn't been written up in a Gentoo-friendly manner,
and since the Exherbo documentation doesn't seem to suffice to explain
the idea here, here's some more details on the DEPENDENCIES proposal.
There's change, and there's progress.
On 08/08/12 22:15, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 15:11:42 +0200
Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote:
[snip]
Yowza! All the packages that provide systemd unit files are installing
them?! But I don't even use systemd. I don't want this cruft on my
system.
Proposal: global USE
On 08/08/12 22:35, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
You are right. In case users really intend to use that, they may be
better using app-portage/install-mask, and:
$ install-mask -a systemd
which will add just the right path.
On 07/19/12 03:05, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
AFAIK, neither genkernel nor dracut were expected to get tied to the
Gentoo update process. Has that changed?
We don't even update kernels as part of the regular update process,
let
On 06/23/12 21:21, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
There's been a move towards using slots for clever things that don't
fit the traditional way of how slots worked. Examples include the new
gtk2 / gtk3 handling and Ruby gems virtuals.
Aside from being abusive,
No, it solves a real problem.
this
On 06/21/12 15:25, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 21-06-2012 a las 08:00 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh escribió:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2012 08:08:55 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Also, if I remember correctly, Tommy asked for this some months ago,
you asked for what he sent some days ago and now
On 05/10/12 06:36, Greg KH wrote:
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 08:51:37PM +0200, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I foresee a new udev fork then.
Please feel free to do so, the code has been open since the first day I
created it.
Remember, forks are good, there's nothing wrong with them, I strongly
On 05/08/12 07:16, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2012-05-07 at 18:23 -0400, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 05:59:45PM -0700, Greg KH wrote
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:52:33PM -0700, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 04/05/12 14:35, Walter Dnes wrote:
What could work is a shim or compatability
On 04/28/12 01:29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Since I've been configuring a couple of systems lately for remote
access, which include configuring the serial console, I'm wondering if
it would be a good idea to change our inittab so that the default
(commented out) definition of the serial
On 04/15/12 16:16, Ryan Hill wrote:
Right now we have support in some packages for user patches - those being
patches dropped into /etc/portage/patches/pkgname/ - which are automatically
applied. Because this feature is implemented by epatch_user() in
eutils.eclass, it is only available for
On 03/31/12 17:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:44:03 +0300
Alex Alexander alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
@preserved-libs works very well and is awesome. hack or not. IMO it
should be in stable already. I've been using it on stable production
boxes for years without any
On 03/31/12 23:01, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 19:00:00 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Good enough is the worst enemy of perfect.
While we have s 98% solution that doesn't handle all corner cases you
have a theoretical construct in your brain that might
On 03/31/12 23:38, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:30:07 +0800
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
So you think Gentoo should advertise as the chances of it working
are greater than 0%?
I said better ... not repetitive trolls.
If you cared about making things better you'd
On 03/21/12 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote:
As discussed in [gentoo-dev] www-servers herd is empty thread,
we agreed with dropping this herd and let people get what they want
to maintain. This is the list of orphan packages:
www-servers/pound
www-servers/varnish
I'm a gonna take those two if no
On 03/13/12 01:12, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:05:46 +0100
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
See above, even if we should ever move away from bash, GLEP 55 is
still not needed.
...but we might as well go with GLEP 55 anyway, since GLEP 55
definitely works, whereas
On 03/13/12 02:28, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[snip lots of political rhetoric]
GLEP 55 is simple,
No.
it solves all the problems we have
No, it just tries to shove them under the carpet
(including the
version issue, which everyone is conveniently ignoring),
Say what?
it doesn't require us
On 03/11/12 20:01, Pacho Ramos wrote:
After reading previous discussion:
http://help.lockergnome.com/linux/gentoo-dev-Deprecate-EAPIs--ftopict530567.html
Looks like preventing NEW commits from using eapi1 (via repoman) could
be done without major issues. This could even being done also for
On 03/11/12 21:52, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'd deprecate eapi2 too, we don't need 5 flavours around when we
effectively only want to support one (and eapi0 in a few places)
I wouldn't mind having a deprecation timeline
On 01/06/12 05:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
[snip]
The only thing I see them sacrificing is loose coupling, they provide
more functionality than any other init system, more correctness
(seriously, did you ever read most init scripts out there?), more well
defined behavior (all systemd systems boot
On 01/01/12 15:12, Olivier Crête wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 2011-12-31 at 19:59 -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
I have been working with robbat2 on solutions to the separate /usr issue
(That is why I have specifically cc'd him on this email)
which will allow people to not use an initramfs. If we migrate
On 11/14/11 09:25, Alex Alexander wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 05:59:21PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
Well, it's much easier to gather interest and get feedback if we deploy
the change and ask questions later.
What if we tried solving this problem by providing more options instead
of trying to
On 11/11/11 16:44, Zac Medico wrote:
good point. we don't want to punish old portage users. let's enable it by
default in portage itself then. just add `elog` output to the portage ebuild
to inform users of the change ? or do we want a news item ?
what's the flag to negate the default ?
On 11/04/11 13:59, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
check_extra_config requires a configured kernel
(/usr/src/linux/.config), while I think it should also be satisfied by
/proc/config.gz (i.e. just a way to verify the config, not necessarily
kernel built locally).
The running kernel is really
On 10/30/11 23:33, Petteri Räty wrote:
On 27.10.2011 2.40, Mike Frysinger wrote:
i can't see any ebuild/eclass using egethome, egetshell,
is-login-disabled from portability.eclass. anyone have a reason for
keeping these before i punt them ?
-mike
Breaking overlays.
grepping over all
On 10/25/11 16:18, Kacper Kowalik wrote:
W dniu 20.10.2011 10:47, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. pisze:
I've noticed
http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/SecurityHardeningBuildFlags, i.e.
Debian is starting to make more and more hardening features default, at
least for most packages.
Should we start doing
On 09/20/11 09:12, Alex Alexander wrote:
The only real gotcha is if portage is so old that it can't handle the
binary packages. However, to get around that we really just need a
set of step-wise binary updates for portage itself so that you can
sequence it up to something that can install the
On 09/20/11 15:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
What do you guys think?
I haven't ever tried it but, what would occur if that people with really
updated systems simply unpack an updated stage3 tarball in their / and,
later, try to update?
Usually things turn ugly - used to be that portage saw that
On 09/20/11 17:19, Zac Medico wrote:
On 09/19/2011 03:14 PM, Alex Alexander wrote:
My idea is simple. When incompatible changes have to be introduced to the
tree, push a new version of portage that includes support for all the new
features we want to provide.
Then, freeze the tree and clone it
On 09/20/11 23:18, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
[snipped to bits]
So, the issue is obvious, we have packages in testing that are in
better shape than stable ones.
I'm aware that some of my packages could use a stablereq, but since I
don't run any stable machines at the moment it just never bothers me.
On 09/13/11 16:44, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 15:02 Tue 13 Sep , Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
Excerpts from Joshua Kinard's message of 2011-09-13 14:26:02 +0200:
You don't need -n/-z with [[.
[[ $var ]] == [[ -n $var ]]
[[ ! $var ]] == [[ -z $var ]]
What about other comparisons, like
On 08/29/11 13:33, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:23, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
Which Zope team is that? Would that be you? Having an overlay with
updated packages certainly sounds good, but it would be nice to have
some indication of what we're waiting for, or
On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
Hi,
On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
documented (and comments in the code are not enough):
What data exactly is the client sending to the server?!
What you need
On 08/21/11 13:29, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
After updating libraries, I always run something like
lsof -x / | grep DEL
to see if any running binaries are linking to old libraries that were
just updated and then I manually restart them. This is particularly
important
On 08/18/11 10:50, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have already said this before, but it looks like nobody cared. We have
a problem for what concerns Gentoo-generated distfiles.
People being quiet doesn't imply they don't care - just that it gets
really frustrating to repeat the
On 08/15/11 21:55, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 12:46:59 -0700
Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Hello,
Now that we don't have any old-style virtuals in gx86 anymore,
I think the 'virtual' category is
be. We should figure out a reliable way to
move an old install forward ...
(I have some ideas, but it all takes time and lots of testing)
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
On 07/01/11 21:25, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
[SNIP]
If we use EAPI 4 in that ebuild we cannot make it stable anytime soon,
correct?
As far as I'm aware we have a stable portage with EAPI 4 in the tree for
a few weeks now, so you can actively use it everywhere.
--
Patrick Lauer http
.
But as OpenRC has some rare features (being able to start and stop
stuff and being reasonably fast among them) and there's no
replacement at the moment I see no reason to add a convoluted mess of
insanity just to feel good.
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo
On 06/29/11 17:14, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 11:08 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote:
On 06/29/11 03:07, Olivier Crête wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 17:10 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
The background is that /etc/init.d/functions.sh is a link to
/lib/rc/functions.sh, which
around the useflags might be very convenient.
May be instead of ~ introduce three additional prefixes (~ and another
two for +~ and -~ cases)?
That looks a bit weird :)
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks
to start with?
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
support disabled. But if you trust 2.1 enough to use it you also
shouldn't have a problem with 2.2.
There's still a few silly bugs with preserved-rebuild (corner cases like
downgrades and stupid build systems), but I've not had any problematic
behaviour in quite a long time ...
--
Patrick Lauer
. Maybe it can be turned into
simple templates to generate all configs from?
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
, that
never ends well.
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
On 06/08/11 11:43, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:28:47 +0200
Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:27, Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org
wrote:
In all cases I want one resource to look at, viewcvs is a horrible
and slow interface. So it does make sense
upstreams ...
I think it would be similar to the situation we had with adobe-flash
packages.
It reminds me more of the (now defunct) live ebuild of chromium-bin
Best regards,
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo
scripts around
wrappers to get things done, so I'll just stay out of the way and
reserve the right to point and laugh when funny misbehaviour happens.
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics
goes well!
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
don't have policies in place yet it's a bit of a mess right
now.
So. What parameters do we need to agree on?
And what's a realistic timeframe *if* we decide to go ahead with it?
Waiting for good answers :)
Patrick
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council
,
Patrick
--
Patrick Lauer http://service.gentooexperimental.org
Gentoo Council Member and Evangelist
Part of Gentoo Benchmarks, Forensics, PostgreSQL, KDE herds
On 12/31/10 12:02, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Hi,
after approval of EAPI 4, there are now 5 different EAPIs available,
and it's hard to remember what features are offered by which EAPI.
So maybe it's about time that we deprecate EAPIs 0 and 1 for new
ebuilds. As a first step, a warning could
On 12/17/10 18:09, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:56:21 +0100
Sebastian Luther sebastianlut...@gmx.de wrote:
Why can't the PM handle = / cases itself?
Because things are almost never as simple as 'just' = / . You can
add in clever trickery to deal with very specific cases,
On 12/11/10 18:57, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Hi all,
bugs like [1] makes clear to me that the increasing number of CPU
extensions USE flags is getting more and more confusing.
[snip]
Among all CPU extensions USE flags you'll find:
3dnow
3dnowext
mmx
mmxext
sse
sse2
sse3
On 11/29/10 10:30, Graham Murray wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis arfre...@gentoo.org writes:
2010-11-29 01:26:19 Robin H. Johnson napisał(a):
Sebastian Pipping recently removed automatic upgrade of active version of
Python, so
python-2.7.1.ebuild does not upgrade active version
On 08/23/10 19:26, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 17:05 +0200, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le lundi 05 juillet 2010 à 08:57 +, Duncan a écrit :
[lots of stuff about bashisms and posix]
So let's stabilize OpenRC and be done with it, and /then/ we can debate
where we want to
On 07/05/10 03:03, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Sun, 2010-07-04 at 18:15 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
which is trivial to fix and anyone with commit privs could have done. it
certainly doesnt warrant a paniced the sky is falling message.
I think this is a great occasion to dump our stupid
With only a few hours left to vote y'all might be wondering What
happened to Patrick's manifesto?
Short version - I'm not in the mood to write long speeches about things
I won't manage to do. We have lots of technical issues to discuss and
decide on (like the recent as-needed discussion, again,
On 06/27/10 13:02, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
[snip]
We also offer 10 versions of glibc, 8 versions of uclibc, and 7 versions
of klibc. Each version may have header bugs, so may trigger warnings for
perfectly good code.
Well, if there're header bugs, shouldn't they get fixed before these
libs
On 06/27/10 17:04, Markos Chandras wrote:
[snip]
Whilst I do understand that these arches are understaffed and they can't keep
up with the increased stabilization load like x86/amd64 do, I still
think that slow stabilization leads to an obsolete stable tree which I
doesn't make sense to me
On 06/27/10 20:33, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 01:08:58PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com schrieb:
Well, at least for tar, I've experienced no problem here yet.
But: true, it might change between tar versions.
The main offender
Now that's tone in Gentoo. Brilliant.
And you're ugly!
Hey, you're doing it yourself. You're using sarcasm (I assume you do,
otherwise the positive Brilliant. doesn't fit in the context of Oh
dear, these rude people said that!)
I think we need to remember to tolerate each other more - there's
On 06/19/10 18:20, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
And never forget, I don't care if you're upset that I filed 35 bugs for
you.
If you mean what you say: that's pretty insensitive.
But I honestly don't care how you _feel_ about a bug.
There's a defect. It's a fact. The only way to change it is to
On 06/19/10 23:20, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jun 2010 23:03:31 +0200
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
That is an incredibly shortsighted and cynic look at the community.
Keep it off this list.
I consider that remark disrespectful. By rejecting comments in such an
impolite
Let me cut out one or two pieces I consider very important:
We communicate in English but that doesn't mean we all the same cultural
background. My native language doesn't do small talk and doesn't have a
word for please.
Now of course this will cause friction. I've noticed it especially with
On 06/17/10 22:09, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Patrick,
On 06/17/10 18:21, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Now of course this will cause friction. I've noticed it especially with
germanic and slavic languages that are more terse than english.
For example Sit down! is acceptable in all situations
On 06/05/10 13:36, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 02:00, Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2010/2011 are now open for the next
two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2010).
I'd like to nominate patrick
I accept the nomination.
and vapier.
On 06/02/10 09:18, Torsten Veller wrote:
Here's a bunch of packages up for grabs, due to maintainers retiring..
maintainer-needed
-
app-admin/monit
app-forensics/samhain
app-misc/anki
app-misc/beanstalkd
dev-libs/vanessa-adt
dev-libs/vanessa-logger
On 05/20/10 15:34, Peter Volkov wrote:
В Втр, 11/05/2010 в 11:53 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
start() {
+# we can't assume that /var/run/ is persistent, so create dir if needed
+[ ! -e /var/run/samba ] mkdir /var/run/samba
Why? Is it impossible to create /var/run/samba
On 04/08/10 15:29, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:02:25 -0700
Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote:
4) if there are questions re: use cycle breaking or other bits, feel
free to ask prior please- council meeting times unfortunately right
now intersect badly with my paying
On 04/04/10 03:48, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sat, 03 Apr 2010 11:16:32 +0200
Tobias Scherbaum dertobi...@gentoo.org wrote:
- Our formerly outstanding documentation still is somewhat maintained,
but that's it. I haven't seen any new additions (both to our docs, but
also to our docs-team) for
On 04/03/10 11:16, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Hell no, but ...
We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way.
Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas were
users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead.
So what are _you_ doing to make it
On 03/18/10 18:24, Sébastien Fabbro wrote:
On Thursday 18 March, Markos Chandras wrote:
1) Should we use a new overlay? A new branch on sunrise? or work
ebuilds in Gentoo bugzilla?I think the latter is the best
2) I think an email alias is not needed We can monitor
maintainer-wanted/-
On 02/26/10 22:01, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/26/2010 10:49 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote:
patrick 10/02/26 20:49:19
Modified: ChangeLog
Added:samhain-2.6.2.ebuild
Log:
Bump
(Portage version: 2.2_rc63/cvs/Linux x86_64)
Index: samhain-2.6.2
On 02/26/10 22:02, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 02/26/2010 10:50 PM, Patrick Lauer (patrick) wrote:
src_test() {
if hasq sandbox ${FEATURES}; then
ewarn zzuf tests don't work correctly when sandbox is enabled,
ewarn skipping tests. If you want to run the testsuite
# Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org (09 Jan 2010)
# Package has been unsplit, use net-analyzer/zabbix
net-analyzer/zabbix-agent
net-analyzer/zabbix-frontend
net-analyzer/zabbix-server
Unmaintained and no longer useful as package has been unsplit
On 12/24/09 23:50, Roy Bamford wrote:
On 2009.12.16 00:36, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hello.
As announced by Denis (Calchan)[1], we need to have an election for
the
Gentoo Council's empty seat.
We'll be putting up a page with all the information for the Council
election, including
On Monday 09 November 2009 13:08:52 Peter Volkov wrote:
[Snip]
Well, it looks like the root of this problem is the following statement:
QA is less important then new packages in the tree. I failed to hear
any arguments why QA is unimportant so I still believe that QA problem
is a problem.
On Monday 09 November 2009 21:16:28 Mike Frysinger wrote:
oh muffin ! get over it already. either do it right or stop doing it.
perl?
That's how you want to handle things? Great.
I think we can agree that that strategy doesn't work.
You should understand one thing: I don't care at all
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-forensics/foremost/fo
remost-1.5.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:56:24 Petteri Räty wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 15:21:18 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 11:56 +, Patrick Lauer (patrick) пишет:
patrick 09/11/08 11:56:46
Log:
Bump
file :
http://sources.gentoo.org
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped obsessing about such details and just fix
it instead
Do you mean that whatever you commit to the tree is not your
On Sunday 08 November 2009 19:24:47 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 13:10:34 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 18:37:10 Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 08/11/2009 в 16:06 +0100, Patrick Lauer пишет:
And because I'm a lazy
I'd appreciate if y'all stopped
On Sunday 08 November 2009 20:27:23 Mark Loeser wrote:
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org said:
If you feel you have too much time you could search on bugzilla for
patch and start fixing those bugs. Bump is also a funny search.
If you are just bumping random packages and applying patches
On Wednesday 04 November 2009 01:33:23 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Calling EAPI is ... well ... I can't even think of a place to start to
explain how wrong it is. How on earth are you going to parse an eclass
that supports multiple EAPIs where one EAPI were to support
On Wednesday 04 November 2009 01:11:39 Ryan Hill wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:28:57 +0100
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
And then why bother when the tree doesn't reflect PMS.
Maybe if some people would stop ignoring PMS on whim because they don't
agree with something
Hi there,
a while ago Thilo Bangert spent quite some time on filing lots of bugs. While
I appreciate such QA efforts I don't agree with those bugs at all.
All of these bugs were for the use of the FEATURES variable in ebuilds, which
is a very convenient thing to work around issues.
For
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 18:27:46 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Hi there,
a while ago Thilo Bangert spent quite some time on filing lots of bugs.
While I appreciate such QA efforts I don't agree with those bugs at all.
All of these bugs were for the use
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 22:26:24 Alexis Ballier wrote:
To quote:
FEATURES is a portage specific package manager configuration
variable not specified in PMS and cannot reliably be used in ebuilds
or eclasses.
For distcc ccache, let me quote ebuild.sh code:
if hasq distcc
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:58:27 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:36:18 +0100
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
Userpriv I've seen the funny idea to check if UID=0 and such.
Yes, and that 'funny idea' has the added advantage of working even if
userpriv
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 11:10:39 Torsten Veller wrote:
* Torsten Vellert...@gentoo.org:
After that I'll minimize my perl work if no more people join to help.
Plan revised: I stop doing perl work right now.
Thanks for all the time you spent on perl.
I can understand that doing
On Saturday 17 October 2009 01:29:00 Daniel Bradshaw wrote:
Some packages, like findutils, are pretty robust and generally just get on
with working.
Other packages, like apache and ssh, need are more fragile and need plenty
of configuration.
That's almost completely user-side configuration
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:22:26 Petteri Räty wrote:
across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms
can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks
in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI
Comments like
On Wednesday 07 October 2009 13:13:31 Duncan wrote:
Ryan Hill posted on Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:38:18 -0600 as excerpted:
I'd like to propose a new USE flag, qa-test or a better name, to handle
these cases in a consistent way. This would give us a way to
differentiate between tests that
201 - 300 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
