> On Thu, 05 Oct 2023, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Entries Grouping
>>
>>
>> Each mask entry consists of 2 parts: `comments block`_ and `packages list`_,
>> which aren't separated by a blank line between the 2 parts. Between entries,
>> a
>> mandatory blank line must appear.
>>
> On Thu, 05 Oct 2023, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> On 05/10/2023 06.12, Michał Górny wrote:
>> This is inconsistent with the current usage, and confusing. "After"
>> makes it unclear whether the list is inclusive (i.e. "remove on that day
>> or later") or exclusive ("remove the next day or
On 05/10/2023 06.12, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 21:43 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
>> Specification
>> =
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Must conform to PMS sections 4.4 [#PMS-4.4]_ and 5.2.8 [#PMS-5.2.8]_. This
>> GLEP
>> further limits the syntax to one item per line, without any
On 05/10/2023 06.12, Michał Górny wrote:
> "Block" in two meanings, confusing.
Thanks for the improvements, I'll apply them soon on the branch, and
send as DRAFT v2 when some more changes collect.
>
>> explanation where needed. If referencing bugs, use the `bugs list`_ format
>> (mask
On Wed, 2023-10-04 at 21:43 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote:
> Specification
> =
>
> Header
> --
>
> As an opt-in GLEP for files, files which want to use this GLEP format should
> define a special header line which tools should use to know the format of the
> file. This line should
Hi all
As result of the discussion on gentoo-dev ML [1], I've been working on a
GLEP for the standard format for package.mask files. I've tried to
incorporate all the things spoken on that thread.
Currently this GLEP draft can be found on the glep-0084 branch [2].
Please also note that English
