Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-03-03 Thread Raymond Jennings
I think best of all would be the good discipline not to break the tree in the first place. Is this something that Repoman could have caught? If no, should it in the future? On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 03 Feb 2016 22:35, Andreas K. Huettel

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 03 Feb 2016 22:35, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 02:33:30 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > > I took the liberty of doing (2) and reverted the commit. Not sure why > > > this needs so much discussion; after all a broken tree is always > > > suboptimal. > > > > unless

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-03 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 02:33:30 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > > I took the liberty of doing (2) and reverted the commit. Not sure why > > this needs so much discussion; after all a broken tree is always > > suboptimal. > > unless things are on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-01 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am Montag, 1. Februar 2016, 21:30:41 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On 01 Feb 2016 19:55, Patrice Clement wrote: > > > New issues: > > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/780f65b/output.html#dev-> > > > > > libs/efl > > > > This commit is

[gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-01 Thread Patrice Clement
Hi dlan This commit is breaking the tree: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=97a6aec I did try to work around the issue you've introduced when but the enlightenment eclasses are a bit of mystery to me and I eventually gave up. Could you revert this commit and fix this issue?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 01 Feb 2016 19:55, Patrice Clement wrote: > > New issues: > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/780f65b/output.html#dev-libs/efl > > This commit is breaking the tree: > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=97a6aec > > I did try to work around the issue you've

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-01 Thread Yixun Lan
On 22:16 Mon 01 Feb , Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag, 1. Februar 2016, 21:30:41 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > On 01 Feb 2016 19:55, Patrice Clement wrote: > > > > New issues: > > > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/780f65b/output.html#dev-> > > > > > > libs/efl > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-automated-testing] BROKEN: repository became broken!]

2016-02-01 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 01 Feb 2016 22:16, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Montag, 1. Februar 2016, 21:30:41 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > On 01 Feb 2016 19:55, Patrice Clement wrote: > > > > New issues: > > > > https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/780f65b/output.html#dev-libs/efl > > > > > > This commit is