El dom, 28-05-2023 a las 15:16 +0200, Ulrich Müller escribió:
> At this point, almost all upstreams will have switched to
> configure.ac.
> Therefore, configure.in is most likely an indication of an inactive
> upstream, and there is no useful way for the ebuild maintainer to
> silence the warning
Ulrich Müller writes:
> At this point, almost all upstreams will have switched to configure.ac.
> Therefore, configure.in is most likely an indication of an inactive
> upstream, and there is no useful way for the ebuild maintainer to
> silence the warning (other than the ebuild renaming the
At this point, almost all upstreams will have switched to configure.ac.
Therefore, configure.in is most likely an indication of an inactive
upstream, and there is no useful way for the ebuild maintainer to
silence the warning (other than the ebuild renaming the file).
Keep the message as einfo,
