Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-02 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Fri, 2 Jun 2017 15:34:19 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 01:14:31PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 > > "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > > > > As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or three

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-02 Thread Walter Dnes
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 01:14:31PM +1200, Kent Fredric wrote > On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 > "Walter Dnes" wrote: > > > As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or three other > > people do their own forks? Plugin 1 works with vim A and B but > > not C or D.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-02 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
> strongly against eselect modules (and any user code) that > writes into /usr (except for /usr/local) Well, NeoVim, at least, have support for site-dir in /usr/local out of the box. I guess, Vim8 will need a bit of patching for that. Although, I'm, in opposite, dislike (very little, tho)

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Michał Górny
On pią, 2017-06-02 at 04:56 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > 1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? > > 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php- > like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by > neither of vims,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or three other people > do their own forks? Plugin 1 works with vim A and B but not C or D. > Plugin 2 works with vim A and C and D but not B. The number of >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
1) Dear Vim Team, can we hear your opinions? 2) I'd like to know if discussion participants really differs my eselect-php- like suggestion (where all scripts goes to another directory, controlled by neither of vims, and then users should/can manually dis-/enable modules for each of vim they

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 1 Jun 2017 09:38:01 -0400 "Walter Dnes" wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:54:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote > > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to > > work with

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Walter Dnes
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:54:59PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work > with both install to that directory. As mentioned elsewhere, what happens when two or

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-06-01 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
> - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work > with both install to that directory. Actually it is almost the thing I described as "second" eselect variant. Although, you suggest for gentoo devs to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 07:00:30 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to > > work with both install to that directory. > > ...and then vimthreesome for

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Michał Górny
On śro, 2017-05-31 at 23:54 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700 > "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote: > > - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all > > the installed files > > > > - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 05/31/2017 03:54 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700 > "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote: >> - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all >> the installed files >> >> - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Kent Fredric
On Wed, 31 May 2017 23:54:59 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > - Have a separate anyvimishthing directory, and make both vim and > neovim look there, and only make plugins that have been tested to work > with both install to that directory. +1 pgpmXJgzQwGtk.pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 01 Jun 2017 02:32:24 +0700 "Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov" wrote: > - implementing "nvim-syntax" (and `app-nvim/*`?) and duplicate all > the installed files > > - patching NeoVim source to include Vim's runtimedirs (incl. "after" > dir), // NeoVim upstream highly disagree

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Peter Volkov
Hi. On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > Currently, we have a situation, that there are two Vim's: "old" one (vim8) and > NeoVim... Unfortunately, both of them have different runtimedirs... > > ... NeoVim supports Vim's plugins/scripts very well

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] NeoVim and vim-syntax

2017-05-31 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
Currently, we have a situation, that there are two Vim's: "old" one (vim8) and NeoVim (for those who do not know: a fork of Vim with much and much more clean code, many neat features and so on). Unfortunately, both of them have different runtimedirs: XDG ones for NeoVim and the ones you know