Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-22 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 22/05/17 21:05, Matthias Maier wrote: >> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok, >> we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB >> O-CLOCK!" > This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last > days in Gentoo. Just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-22 Thread Matthias Maier
> Were this an actual office, this would be better solved with a "ok, > we've clearly been working too hard this week, everyone stop, ITS PUB > O-CLOCK!" This is most definitely true for almost everything going on for the last days in Gentoo. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 22 May 2017 14:24:24 +1000 Sam Jorna wrote: > I suspect it's likely a misunderstanding - without notification, all > anyone from Proxy Maint sees is proxy-maint being removed. An E-Mail > to proxy-maint@g.o explaining that you've spoken to and are taking > over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On Mon, 22 May 2017 06:10:11 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > ... Now that we know how it goes we can skip the rest and just glare > at Michal for not being a reasonable person once more, and just > continue doing useful stuff. Were this an actual office, this would be better

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 07:47:19AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > > > they > > > were unconditionally added to all packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Michał Górny
On pon, 2017-05-22 at 11:52 +1000, Sam Jorna wrote: > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they > > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer > > in > > metadata) they are the de facto

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 06:12:54AM +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: > > On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since > >> they > >> were unconditionally added to all packages with a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread M. J. Everitt
On 22/05/17 05:12, Patrick Lauer wrote: > On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: >> On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: >>> Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially >>> since they >>> were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev >>> maintainer in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/22/2017 03:52 AM, Sam Jorna wrote: On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/20/2017 10:51 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have to try to match him. Was this comment really

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-21 Thread Sam Jorna
On 18/05/17 02:38, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Since proxy-maint refuses to be removed from packages (especially since they > were unconditionally added to all packages with a non-gentoo-dev maintainer in > metadata) they are the de facto maintainers, and overrule everything else. Just to clarify, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
> > Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does... Oh please cut it. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/20/2017 11:06 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On sob, 2017-05-20 at 22:51 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job >>> as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Michał Górny
On sob, 2017-05-20 at 22:51 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job > > as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have > > to try to match him. > > Was

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/20/2017 10:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Tomas, please don't go this road. We all know Patrick does a shitty job > as Gentoo developer, both technically and socially but you do not have > to try to match him. Was this comment really necessary? -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP keyblock

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Michał Górny
On sob, 2017-05-20 at 21:57 +0200, Tomas Mozes wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > > I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions > > failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days > > old, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > I tried removing proxy-maint from metadata after multiple discussions > failed. Extra happiness towards monsieurp "but the GH PR is over 3 days > old, I have to commit" and gokturk "Yes I understand. I commit anyway" > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I "was" package maintainer and relied on these versions. > > If I as maintainer have no control over such things, why am I maintainer, > and why do I need an overlay? > > > ... that sounds exquisitely confused, I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-20 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 6:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one > wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person who > touched it gets stuck with it. > For elasticsearch, you added

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/20/2017 12:43 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > ef2b2458815ba4e4694e0d5f3bbce239505ffbc8 - 2015-12-20 > > Idella4's last commit on this package. > > 3d70356565d3213c370e1f64a85b55c3ded259f5 - 2016-01-06 > > Patricks first direct commit to this package. > > <> > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 19 May 2017 19:27:15 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > As far as I can see you were never the maintainer of at least > app-misc/elasticsearch (I didn't check other possibly related > packages), it was first proxied maintained through chainsaw, then > later through

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 05/19/2017 06:50 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > > I have no idea how I could have fixed this without the QA+Comrel > banhammer combo, which is a totally insane "fix" to a problem that > shouldn't even exist. But I see no other options how to make people > understand that "No means no". > > Is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/19/2017 03:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: Bonus mention: bbdc5412061adf598ed935697441a7d6b05f7614 app-admin/logstash-bin: drop old Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko That removed the versions I was using, so

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 05/18/2017 07:17 PM, Alec Warner wrote: On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Patrick Lauer > wrote: Ohey, as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all elasticsearch-related packages. For some strange

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-19 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2017-05-17 at 18:38 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Bonus mention: > bbdc5412061adf598ed935697441a7d6b05f7614 > app-admin/logstash-bin: drop old > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Savchenko > > That removed the versions I was using, so I better maintain the versions

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-18 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > Ohey, > > as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all > elasticsearch-related packages. > For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one > wanted to listen to my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-18 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Wed, 17 May 2017 18:38:28 +0200 Patrick Lauer wrote: > Ohey, > > as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all > elasticsearch-related packages. > For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no > one wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I

[gentoo-dev] Fixing elasticsearch maintainer

2017-05-17 Thread Patrick Lauer
Ohey, as you might have noticed I've just corrected the metadata.xml of all elasticsearch-related packages. For some strange reason I was listed there as maintainer, but since no one wanted to listen to my ideas I guess I wasn't. So now last person who touched it gets stuck with it. Since