Il giorno lun 27 set 2021 alle ore 18:11 Mike Gilbert
ha scritto:
> I'm looking to solicit opinions on when it is appropriate for an
> ebuild to check for kernel config options using linux-info.eclass. I
> don't think we have any guidelines documented, instead leaving it up
> to the "common
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 15:44 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:11 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > It's a waste of time and effort to pepper random ebuilds with checks
> > > for options that everyone should have enabled in the first place.
> >
> > It's
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > It's a waste of time and effort to pepper random ebuilds with checks
> > > for options that everyone should have enabled in the first place.
> >
> > It's not for you to say what everyone should have enabled in their kernel.
>
> Do you not agree that there are some
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:28 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:44 AM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > I think we need to strip out a lot of the crap about trying to detect
> > things in the stuff being built, and reduce the check to the simplest
> > possible form:
> > $ time
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:44 AM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I think we need to strip out a lot of the crap about trying to detect
> things in the stuff being built, and reduce the check to the simplest
> possible form:
> $ time zgrep -w CONFIG_PACKET /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_PACKET=y
The results
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:11 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > It's a waste of time and effort to pepper random ebuilds with checks
> > for options that everyone should have enabled in the first place.
>
> It's not for you to say what everyone should have enabled in their kernel.
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> It's a waste of time and effort to pepper random ebuilds with checks
> for options that everyone should have enabled in the first place.
It's not for you to say what everyone should have enabled in their kernel.
There's significant value in ebuilds documenting required
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:56 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:44 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >
> > I think we need to strip out a lot of the crap about trying to detect
> > things in the stuff being built, and reduce the check to the simplest
> > possible form:
> > $ time
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote:
>
> On 9/27/21 12:10 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > I'm looking to solicit opinions on when it is appropriate for an
> > ebuild to check for kernel config options using linux-info.eclass. I
> > don't think we have any guidelines documented, instead
On 9/27/21 2:15 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:44 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 01:15:10PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote:
Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or pkg_setup causes slowdowns
when
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:44 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 01:15:10PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > > Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or pkg_setup causes slowdowns
> > > > when running emerge, so we should
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 1:44 PM Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> I think we need to strip out a lot of the crap about trying to detect
> things in the stuff being built, and reduce the check to the simplest
> possible form:
> $ time zgrep -w CONFIG_PACKET /proc/config.gz
> CONFIG_PACKET=y
>
Sure,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 01:15:10PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote:
> > > Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or pkg_setup causes slowdowns
> > > when running emerge, so we should do so only when there is a
> > > compensating benefit.
> >
> > Is
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 12:23 PM Mike Pagano wrote:
> > Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or pkg_setup causes slowdowns
> > when running emerge, so we should do so only when there is a
> > compensating benefit.
>
> Is this a significant slowdown? Do you have any numbers?
Adding a check for
On 9/27/21 12:10 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
I'm looking to solicit opinions on when it is appropriate for an
ebuild to check for kernel config options using linux-info.eclass. I
don't think we have any guidelines documented, instead leaving it up
to the "common sense" of package maintainers.
I'm looking to solicit opinions on when it is appropriate for an
ebuild to check for kernel config options using linux-info.eclass. I
don't think we have any guidelines documented, instead leaving it up
to the "common sense" of package maintainers.
Adding linux-info calls to pkg_pretend or
16 matches
Mail list logo
