Alec Warner wrote:
> Currently mgorny is the listed maintainer of boa. What if instead of a
> bunch of CVEs he just decided he had better things to do with his
> time.
> He last-rites the package, giving a 90d deadline for the package to
> find a new owner.
> No one cares to maintain boa, so no
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 08:30:03PM +, Peter Stuge wrote:
> John Helmert III wrote:
> > > > There are multiple CVEs for it, is it really on us to discriminate
> > > > between which CVEs are valid and which are not?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> ..
> > > > We can't possibly hope to do that accurately in
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:30 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
>
> John Helmert III wrote:
> > > > There are multiple CVEs for it, is it really on us to discriminate
> > > > between which CVEs are valid and which are not?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> ..
> > > > We can't possibly hope to do that accurately in all
John Helmert III wrote:
> > > There are multiple CVEs for it, is it really on us to discriminate
> > > between which CVEs are valid and which are not?
> >
> > Yes.
..
> > > We can't possibly hope to do that accurately in all cases.
> >
> > Some times it will be easy, other times less easy.
..
>
On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 06:29:28PM +, Peter Stuge wrote:
> John Helmert III wrote:
> > So much yapping on the mailing lists, and no response in the bug which
> > triggered the last rites...
>
> Apologies if I responed in the wrong forum. I thought on list would
> be good, why are those mails
John Helmert III wrote:
> So much yapping on the mailing lists, and no response in the bug which
> triggered the last rites...
Apologies if I responed in the wrong forum. I thought on list would
be good, why are those mails on the list if not?
> So, Peter, do you use Boa?
Not right now, but I
So much yapping on the mailing lists, and no response in the bug which
triggered the last rites...
So, Peter, do you use Boa? If you do, what niche does it fill that
isn't filled by anything else? There are multiple CVEs for it, is it
really on us to discriminate between which CVEs are valid and
On Fri, Dec 2, 2022 at 12:20 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
> If you wanted to encourage me to become a Gentoo developer and (among
> other things) improve the lastriting process then you missed the mark,
> in fact your behavior consistently remains one strong reason for me
> to *not* become a Gentoo
Michał Górny wrote:
> > Shouldn't this process work a lot better?
>
> Processes tend to work better when people are contributing towards
> making the processes work better rather than complaining from their
> comfy armchairs that they tend to confuse with thrones.
LOL!
Are you honestly arguing
On Mon, 2022-11-28 at 07:45 +, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Shouldn't this process work a lot better?
Processes tend to work better when people are contributing towards
making the processes work better rather than complaining from their
comfy armchairs that they tend to confuse with thrones.
--
John Helmert III wrote:
> # John Helmert III (2022-11-27)
> # Unmaintained upstream, several unresolved public vulnerabilities,
> # Removal in 30 days. Bug #882773.
> www-servers/boa
This is bogus, please revert.
Who are you to declare unmaintained? It's a simple program so maybe
it simply
# John Helmert III (2022-11-27)
# Unmaintained upstream, several unresolved public vulnerabilities,
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #882773.
www-servers/boa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# Raúl Porcel armin76 at gentoo dot org (18 May 2007)
# For treecleaners, bug 102174
# Pending removal 17 Jul 2007
www-servers/boa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
