On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 1:40 AM, Christopher Head wrote:
>
> Why? It’s just another dependency. Why does DEPEND="dev-libs/bar" work
> so beautifully but DEPEND="dev-libs/bar[baz]" work so horribly? If I
> haven’t explicitly said I want baz, and I haven’t explicitly said I
> *don’t*
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:11:43 +0100
Róbert Čerňanský wrote:
> If I may add a user opinion. I agree with you but I would choose
> different solution for user-friendliness. Instead of _adding_
> interactivity to PM I would _remove_ it. So if there would be
> multiple
On 01/27/2017 12:51 PM, NP-Hardass wrote:
> On 01/27/2017 12:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>> Forked from the gdbm/berkdb thread, wall of text ensues...
>>
>>
>> On 01/27/2017 03:32 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>>
>>> You mention REQUIRED_USE should be used sparingly, I think I see your
>>>
On Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:51:27 -0500
NP-Hardass wrote:
> On 01/27/2017 12:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> > Forked from the gdbm/berkdb thread, wall of text ensues...
> >
> >
> > On 01/27/2017 03:32 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> >>
> >> You mention REQUIRED_USE should be
On 01/28/2017 08:27 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:57:00PM -0500, james wrote
Exactly:: simplify the flags, profiles and associated constructs down to
the bare bones. Even embedded (arm/mips/etc) builds could benefit from a
really minimized gentoo as a starting point.
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 02:57:00PM -0500, james wrote
>
> Exactly:: simplify the flags, profiles and associated constructs down to
> the bare bones. Even embedded (arm/mips/etc) builds could benefit from a
> really minimized gentoo as a starting point. Freedom to build and fork
> Gentoo, per
On 01/27/2017 12:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Forked from the gdbm/berkdb thread, wall of text ensues...
>
>
> On 01/27/2017 03:32 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>>
>> You mention REQUIRED_USE should be used sparingly, I think I see your
>> reasoning, but if so, then why did we add it in the
On 01/27/2017 12:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Forked from the gdbm/berkdb thread, wall of text ensues...
On 01/27/2017 03:32 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
You mention REQUIRED_USE should be used sparingly, I think I see your
reasoning, but if so, then why did we add it in the first place?
Forked from the gdbm/berkdb thread, wall of text ensues...
On 01/27/2017 03:32 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
>
> You mention REQUIRED_USE should be used sparingly, I think I see your
> reasoning, but if so, then why did we add it in the first place?
There are a few conflicting interests at play.