On 09/06/15 03:21, Alec Warner wrote:
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org
mailto:j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 17:28:03 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sorry, I could I have sworn I saw something about easier scripting
somewhere in the thread.
Now you have two problems. ;-)
jer
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or policy
Dnia 2015-06-08, o godz. 08:36:02
Justin (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18
Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 12:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 06/08/2015 12:47 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:26:08AM +0200, Justin Lecher (jlec)
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
On 07/06/15 22:22, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18
Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote:
On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote:
On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert
flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about.
...
However, I do not
Dnia 2015-06-07, o godz. 22:16:18
Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote:
On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert
flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about.
and is something nobody should care about: xml is not a regular
language :)
On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Compatibility with sed scripts is not something I care about.
and is something nobody should care about: xml is not a regular
language :)
If you are enforcing split lines
On 06 Jun 2015 12:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Visual space is what you set in your editor. Which also gives tab
the advantage that you can set it to something good for you, like
'more than 2 spaces so that it is readable'.
*If* we should agree on
On Sun, Jun 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM, Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 07/06/15 14:48, Andrew Udvare wrote:
On 07/06/15 05:12, Alexis Ballier wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015 22:00:14 -0400 Mike Gilbert
flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:26:08
Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing
the
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
* 2 spaces
* single tab
So what should it be?
Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no
indentation of the top-level elements.
Ulrich
pgpmxfmE7_yBp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 10:02:53AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no
indentation of the top-level elements.
That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes.
Visual space.
:set ts=2
Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 10:02:53
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no
indentation of the top-level elements.
That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes.
Visual
Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:46:27
Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
* 2 spaces
* single tab
So what should it be?
Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no
indentation of the top-level elements.
That's
On 06/06/15 09:26, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing
the wrong.
The two options
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing
the wrong.
The two options which
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Tabs are too wasteful on space. Therefore, two spaces, and no
indentation of the top-level elements.
That's nonsense. Tab = 1 byte. Two spaces = 2 bytes.
Visual space.
Ulrich
pgpYsZj5GseK_.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jun 06, 2015 at 09:34:41AM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-06-06, o godz. 09:26:08
Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an
On Sat, 6 Jun 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
Visual space is what you set in your editor. Which also gives tab
the advantage that you can set it to something good for you, like
'more than 2 spaces so that it is readable'.
*If* we should agree on using tabs, then we should also standardise
the tab
On Sat, 06 Jun 2015 09:25:33 +0200
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/06/15 09:26, Justin Lecher (jlec) wrote:
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without
having an agreement or
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2015, 09:26:08 schrieb Justin Lecher (jlec):
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or policy on the indention, I make unhappy by choosing
the wrong.
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:26 AM, Justin Lecher (jlec) j...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi everyone,
Can we get an agreement on how we are indenting metadata.xml?
I like to properly format and indent metadata.xml, but without having
an agreement or
The two options which are already suggested are
* 2 spaces
* single tab
So what should it be?
Two spaces per indention with a maximum line width of 80 single-width
Unicode grapheme clusters (equals the with of 80 ASCII characters).
--
Allan Wegan
Jabber: allanwe...@jabber.ccc.de
27 matches
Mail list logo
