Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo

2024-03-09 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 3/9/24 4:13 PM, Duncan wrote: > I'm not saying don't use gentoo -- I'm a gentooer after all -- I'm saying > gentoo simply isn't in a good position to condemn AI for its energy > inefficiency. In fact, I'd claim that in the Gentoo case there are > demonstrably more energy efficient practical

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo

2024-03-09 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Sat, 09 Mar 2024 16:04:58 +0100 as excerpted: > On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 03:59 +, Duncan wrote: >> Robin H. Johnson posted on Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:12:06 + as excerpted: >> >> > The energy waste argument is also one that needs to be made >> > carefully: >> >> Indeed.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo

2024-03-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 03:59 +, Duncan wrote: > Robin H. Johnson posted on Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:12:06 + as excerpted: > > > The energy waste argument is also one that needs to be made carefully: > > Indeed. In a Gentoo context, condemning AI for the computative energy > waste? Maybe

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: banning "AI"-backed (LLM/GPT/whatever) contributions to Gentoo

2024-03-07 Thread Duncan
Robin H. Johnson posted on Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:12:06 + as excerpted: > The energy waste argument is also one that needs to be made carefully: Indeed. In a Gentoo context, condemning AI for the computative energy waste? Maybe someone could argue that effectively. That someone isn't