Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/12/2011 06:30 AM, Steven J Long wrote: Michał Górny wrote: I don't think that passing multiple files to epatch actually improves readability. Simple example: # bug #123456, foo, bar epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-foo.patch # bug #234567, baz bazinga blah blah epatch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:19:25 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 10/12/2011 06:30 AM, Steven J Long wrote: Michał Górny wrote: I don't think that passing multiple files to epatch actually improves readability. Simple example: # bug #123456, foo, bar epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-foo.patch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Alec Warner
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:33 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:19:25 Samuli Suominen wrote: On 10/12/2011 06:30 AM, Steven J Long wrote: Michał Górny wrote: I don't think that passing multiple files to epatch actually improves readability. Simple

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:44:53 Alec Warner wrote: If I want to add a patch to the list I might forget to to add the \ admittedly, i hit this every once in a while, and with all the || die being implicit, it doesn't get caught right away. fortunately latest portage will issue a QA

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
2011/10/12 Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org: On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:44:53 Alec Warner wrote: If I want to add a patch to the list I might forget to to add the \ admittedly, i hit this every once in a while, and with all the || die being implicit, it doesn't get caught right away.  

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Hmm for the command-not-found, it should be fatal not just warning I suppose. I was not even aware of this fancy portage feature :) Tom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:57:45 Tomáš Chvátal wrote: 2011/10/12 Mike Frysinger: On Wednesday 12 October 2011 15:44:53 Alec Warner wrote: If I want to add a patch to the list I might forget to to add the \ admittedly, i hit this every once in a while, and with all the || die being

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-11 Thread Steven J Long
Michał Górny wrote: I don't think that passing multiple files to epatch actually improves readability. Simple example: # bug #123456, foo, bar epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-foo.patch # bug #234567, baz bazinga blah blah epatch ${FILESDIR}/${P}-baz.patch With multiple arguments, you can't put