On Saturday 22 January 2011 20:06:06 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/22/11 13:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in
layman -L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list.
Furthermore, I got at least three requests
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/ list mess in, say, two or five
years
So you're in favour of making it 'people/' and just distinguishing in
the descriptions and Layman?
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 25.1.2011 23:08, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/ list mess in, say, two or five
years
So you're in favour of making it 'people/' and
like on the discovery channel?
-A
2011/1/25 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 25.1.2011 23:08, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 04:38:49AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Assuming we're going to move the git.overlays.gentoo.org repos there as well
in the near future, this is the structure i am proposing:
Yes, they will be merging, but not for many months. What _DO_ need, is
getting the namespaces
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 22:20:27 -0600
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
I don't see any particular reason to distinguish between the main
tree and overlays in this structure. Just do something common for
both, like tree/ or ebuilds/ or packages/.
Yeah, that'd be a good idea for the
On Saturday 22 January 2011 10:55:19 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
1.
We EXPLICITLY need a location for private repositories.
didn't know that, so i guess the private dir should be:
private
- infra
- (infrapriv1).git
- (infrapriv2).git
- foundation
- (foundpriv1).git
- (foundpriv2).git
On Saturday 22 January 2011 06:20:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I don't see any particular reason to distinguish between the main tree
and overlays in this structure. Just do something common for both, like
tree/ or ebuilds/ or packages/. In the same vein, there's no good reason
I can think of to
Hi all!
Why not use redmine as sources.gentoo.org?
2011/1/22 Theo Chatzimichos tampak...@gentoo.org:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 06:20:27 Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I don't see any particular reason to distinguish between the main tree
and overlays in this structure. Just do something common for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-01-2011 03:20, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 04:38 Sat 22 Jan , Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Assuming we're going to move the git.overlays.gentoo.org repos there as well
in the near future, this is the structure i am proposing:
source
-
On Saturday 22 January 2011 16:58:38 Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Hi all!
Why not use redmine as sources.gentoo.org?
idl0r installed trac-git for git.overlays, it needs some testing before
starting to redesign the overlays webpages (ETA 1 month due to my exams) If we
decide that it doesn't suit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 22-01-2011 11:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
On Saturday 22 January 2011 10:55:19 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
1.
We EXPLICITLY need a location for private repositories.
didn't know that, so i guess the private dir should be:
private
- infra
On Saturday 22 January 2011 18:02:59 Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Why not provide a tree for overlays and another for application
repositories?
You just repeated my proposal, with the only difference I splitted project
from website :P
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Gentoo KDE/Qt,
On 01/22/11 13:32, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in
layman
-L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list. Furthermore, I
got
at least three requests from developers to move their repo from user/ to dev/
(same
On 01/22/11 09:55, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
- On one hand, I would like user repositories to have a separate
namespace, so that other users realize a given repo is NOT from a
developer.
Seconding that.
- On the other side, what do we do when a user with a repo becomes a
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 03:02:59PM -0100, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Well, the distinction for unofficial/official overlays happen mostly in
layman
-L, I don't think users pay attention to our git repo list. Furthermore, I
got
at least three requests from developers to move
Hi everybody,
Within the next week or two, the Infrastructure team hopes to have the
Git repos hosted on the main VCS server migrated into Gitolite [4] for
ease of management [1]. A more exact timeline will be published within
the next few days.
We would like to consider re-arranging the
On 21:56 Fri 21 Jan , Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/21/11 21:35, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
gentoo-portage.git [2]
gentoo-portage-historical.git [2]
[..]
[2] This is an idea where I'd like to place the main tree, and the
additional graftable tree with the full history. I'm
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:47:03PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Sweet, we actually got an invitation to bikeshed! Here's my contributions:
gentoo-tree.git
gentoo-portage-tree.git
portage-tree.git
(the name 'portage' derives from bsd ports, so it makes sense to keep
that connection to
On 01/21/11 23:15, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:47:03PM -0600, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Sweet, we actually got an invitation to bikeshed! Here's my contributions:
gentoo-tree.git
gentoo-portage-tree.git
portage-tree.git
(the name 'portage' derives from bsd ports, so it
On Friday 21 January 2011 22:35:38 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi everybody,
Within the next week or two, the Infrastructure team hopes to have the
Git repos hosted on the main VCS server migrated into Gitolite [4] for
ease of management [1]. A more exact timeline will be published within
the
On 04:38 Sat 22 Jan , Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
Assuming we're going to move the git.overlays.gentoo.org repos there as well
in the near future, this is the structure i am proposing:
source
- portage-main.git
- portage-history.git
infra (or sysadmin)
- (repo1).git
- (repo2).git
22 matches
Mail list logo
