Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 20:49, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:22:18 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > > > >>> So I guess we could use

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 19:28, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 >> Davide Pesavento wrote: > >>> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >>> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >>> ? > >> Prolly. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 20:28:33 +0100 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > > Davide Pesavento wrote: > > >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: > >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 > Davide Pesavento wrote: >> So I guess we could use the following form when SLOTs are needed: >> media-libs/gstreamer:1.0 >> ? > Prolly. > Just to be clear, I have no clue what the original use

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 19:26:15 +0100 Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > > "Justin " wrote: > > > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > >> > On Sun,

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 18:18, Michał Górny wrote: >> We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. > > Why? What's their use? In fact, does have any use? Because as I > see it, it's just some fancy feature that could turn package name into > link to packages.gentoo.org and nothing more... >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + > "Justin " wrote: > >> On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 7 March 2016 at 07:12, Justin wrote: >> Slots are not accepted in elements? Is that intentional? If so, >> is there something else we can use? >> > > We should definitely include SLOTs in the allowed syntax. Enable HTML5 audio/video support via media-libs/gstreamer:1.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 18:12:03 + "Justin " wrote: > On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > >> Michał Górny wrote: > >> > >>> Please

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On 06/03/16 12:24, Davide Pesavento wrote: > On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 >> Michał Górny wrote: >> >>> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >>> of current

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > >> Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list >> of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:04:22 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). >

Re: [gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 12:01:19 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Please test and review. I'm going to reply to this mail with the list > of current metadata.xml validation failures (it's quite long). And here's the list: /var/db/repos/gentoo/app-crypt/eid-mw/metadata.xml:26: element

[gentoo-dev] XML Schema files for metadata.xml, projects.xml and repositories.xml, for review and testing

Hello, everyone. As you may be aware, we were considering replacing the DTD files for our XML documents with a more modern and more complete format. As part of considering options for this, I've written XML Schema files [1] that provide a more correct replacement for the current DTD files and I'd