ср, 10 февр. 2021 г. в 01:16, Tim Harder :
>
> On 2021-02-09 Tue 17:51, Benda Xu wrote:
> > I am wondering how useable pkgcore is on alpha, hppa, etc. Maybe it's
> > time for us to plan for a Gentoo without essential Python dependency.
>
> Just to keep misinformation down, pkgcore currently has
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > The first big blocker we're going to hit is trustme [3] package that
> > > relies on cryptography API pretty heavily to generate TLS certs for
> > > testing.
> >
> > For which testing? Could it be changed to generate certs differently?
>
> He is probably referring to the
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 4:57 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
> > The first big blocker we're going to hit is trustme [3] package that
> > relies on cryptography API pretty heavily to generate TLS certs for
> > testing.
>
> For which testing? Could it be changed to generate certs differently?
He is
Michał Górny wrote:
> I'm seriously wondering why I'm wasting so much effort on open source.
Open source only ever works when taking responsibility for one's problems.
> I don't see a good way out of it.
I see a couple. Of course all require some effort.
One was already mentioned; move Gentoo
On Wed, 2021-02-10 at 08:51 +0800, Benda Xu wrote:
> >
> > The first big blocker we're going to hit is trustme [3] package that
> > relies on cryptography API pretty heavily to generate TLS certs for
> > testing. If we managed to convince upstream to support an alternate
> > crypto backend, we'd
On 2021-02-09 Tue 17:51, Benda Xu wrote:
> I am wondering how useable pkgcore is on alpha, hppa, etc. Maybe it's
> time for us to plan for a Gentoo without essential Python dependency.
Just to keep misinformation down, pkgcore currently has nothing to do
with rust as it's implemented in python
Hi Michał,
Michał Górny writes:
> So it seems that upstream has practically closed the discussion,
> and the short summary is that they only care for the 'majority' of
> users, they don't care for minor platforms (but we're free to port
> LLVM/Rust to them) and -- unsurprisingly -- this is a
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 12:19 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
>
> Since cryptography is a
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:35 PM Brian Evans wrote:
>
> On 2/8/2021 12:53 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
> > On 2/8/2021 6:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> >> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that
On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 10:02:43AM -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:56 AM Alessandro Barbieri
> wrote:
> >
> > Il Lun 8 Feb 2021, 12:19 Michał Górny ha scritto:
> >>
> >
> > Should we shed tears for those legacy architectures or move forward? Does
> > anyone really use
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 18:56 +0100, Alessandro Barbieri wrote:
> Il Lun 8 Feb 2021, 12:19 Michał Górny ha scritto:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> > to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> > provide
On 2/8/2021 12:53 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
On 2/8/2021 6:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 12:53 -0500, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 2/8/2021 6:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> > to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> > provide LTS support or security
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:56 AM Alessandro Barbieri
wrote:
>
> Il Lun 8 Feb 2021, 12:19 Michał Górny ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
>> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
>> provide LTS
On 2/8/21 7:53 PM, Brian Evans wrote:
>
> AFAICT, it is just used to pull GPG sigs in gemato via
> dev-python/requests.
>
And it that's true, isn't this only relevant when syncing the tree using
rsync? So using git would still be viable?
-- juippis
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP
Il Lun 8 Feb 2021, 12:19 Michał Górny ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
>
> Since cryptography is a
On 2/8/2021 6:19 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Hi,
FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
Since cryptography is a very important
On 2/8/21 2:27 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> Not only that, but you will be dropping support for at least two of my
> machines that are literally incapable of building the 10+ GiB bundled
> rust package due to the amount of disk space and RAM required.
>
Pardon my intervention, but there is
On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 12:19 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Since cryptography is a very important package in the Python ecosystem,
> and it is an indirect dependency of Portage, this means that we will
> probably have to entirely drop support for architectures that are not
> supported by Rust.
>
> On 8 Feb 2021, at 11:19, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
>
> Since cryptography is
On Mon, 08 Feb 2021 12:19:13 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
>
>
>
> Honestly, I
El lun, 08-02-2021 a las 12:19 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
> Hi,
>
> FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
> to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
> provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
>
> Since
Hi,
FYI the developers of dev-python/cryptography decided that Rust is going
to be mandatory for 1.5+ versions. It's unlikely that they're going to
provide LTS support or security fixes for the old versions.
Since cryptography is a very important package in the Python ecosystem,
and it is an
23 matches
Mail list logo
