On Friday 05 October 2012 10:28:45 Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
i think you misread. they
On Saturday 06 October 2012 21:05:14 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
It's also interesting to note that
Werner Koch of libgcrypt and gnupg fame is also not interested in
supporting x32.
i'd say not terribly relevant considering he also finds pkg-config to be
pointless new technology
-mike
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note that with v8 it's not just about getting v8 itself to compile, but
also
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 5 October 2012 22:28, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Should dev-lang/v8 get p.masked on x32 profile, or is there some better
way to handle it? What are your suggestions?
From what Diego wrote about it, I
On 05/10/2012 07:28, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
I had a crazy idea to just build v8 and v8-dependent packages using
non-x32 ABI, but I'm not sure if it's possible and if it would be the
right thing to do.
Nothing stops you from doing that. But if you want them to load from a
non x32-ABI
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 11:06:04AM -0700, Diego Elio Petten?? wrote
Nothing stops you from doing that. But if you want them to load from a
non x32-ABI application, no way. As I said on my blog before, the big
problem is that x32 is neither x86-64 nor x86 binary compatible (if they
bumped x86
On 06/10/2012 17:52, Walter Dnes wrote:
In other words, all or nothing. An x32 distro is technically
possible, but it would require every last single binary/library/object
file/etc *INCLUDING PROPRIETARY PROGRAMS AND BINARY BLOBS* to be x32 and
only, and no multilib stuff. If amd64 did not
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note that with v8 it's not just about getting v8 itself to compile, but
also making it
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote:
Is it possible to disable the JIT engine?
Well, if you're going to wholesale disable functionality, how about
client-side rendering? It drives me nuts as it is REALLY SLOW!!!
That is, unless the graphics hardware is local
On 5 October 2012 22:28, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is the case with dev-lang/v8: it doesn't build on x32
(https://bugs.gentoo.org/423815), and upstream said they *won't*
support x32
(https://groups.google.com/d/msg/v8-users/c-_URSZqTq8/7wHl095t2CMJ).
Note that with
11 matches
Mail list logo
