On 12/14/2015 04:00 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:20:01 +0300
> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to
>>> repo/gentoo.git!
>>>
>>> So
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 6:12 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Why does the official documentation point me at gkeys-gen, which doesn't
> work
The documentation you linked is a project page for the Gentoo-Keys
project. It represents one possible way to accomplish the goal of
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means
>> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation
>> (because that does NOT work!). I'm almost impressed, but, wow, this is
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 16:30:06 -0500 Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> >> Since signing is mandatory since the git migration, ahem, this means
> >> that no one in the last 5 months(!) actually followed the documentation
> >>
On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
And a related question:
How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way?
... and why is that not default then.
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
>
> And a related question:
>
> How would I actually verify the signatures in a meaningful way?
git log --show-signature does this
Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to
repo/gentoo.git!
So apparently we're signing things with gpg now, so let's read the
official documentation.
The [1] wiki seems to be the canonical location for such things.
Oh dear. The layout is VERY broken. See [2]. Which redirects
Hi,
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to
> repo/gentoo.git!
>
> So apparently we're signing things with gpg now, so let's read the
> official documentation.
> The [1] wiki seems to be the canonical location for
On 12/13/2015 07:50 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:38:55 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On 12/13/2015 06:36 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>>> So apparently we're signing things with gpg now
>> And a related question:
>>
>> How would I actually verify the signatures in a
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 22:20:01 +0300
Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2015 18:36:51 +0100 Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > Oh hey. We're in the future. Let's try to commit something to
> > repo/gentoo.git!
> >
> > So apparently we're signing things with gpg now, so
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/13/2015 07:00 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> [snip]
>
>
I just wanted to say that I didn't have (too) much trouble setting up
my key when I was getting started back in May. I couldn't have done it
without your assistance; I believe one other
11 matches
Mail list logo