On 03 Dec 2015 11:36, William Hubbs wrote:
> 1) All definitions in rc.h, even though they are not formally documented
> in man pages.
this. if it's not meant to be public, it should have been in librc.h or
a similar internal header.
> I'm bringing this up, because I am looking at redesigning
On 12/03/2015 12:36 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like opinions on what is considered the public api of librc.
>
> 1) All definitions in rc.h, even though they are not formally documented
> in man pages.
>
> 2) the definitions in rc.h which are documented in section 3 man pages.
>
On 12/03/2015 06:36 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> I would like opinions on what is considered the public api of librc.
>
> 1) All definitions in rc.h, even though they are not formally documented
> in man pages.
Yes.
The header *is* the public API.
>
> 2) the definitions in rc.h which are
All,
I would like opinions on what is considered the public api of librc.
1) All definitions in rc.h, even though they are not formally documented
in man pages.
2) the definitions in rc.h which are documented in section 3 man pages.
I'm bringing this up, because I am looking at redesigning one
