Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About system and world

2007-10-23 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 15:12:31 +0200 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, the primary goal is to make all sets behave in a consistent way. And some sets have the explicit purpose to rebuild stuff, so making sets selective by default also has issues. The proposed change would also make

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About system and world

2007-10-21 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special treatment for the system and world targets? Mainly I'm interested in removing the selective parameter

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About system and world

2007-10-21 Thread Ned Ludd
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:12 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special treatment for the system and world targets?

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] About system and world

2007-10-21 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marius Mauch wrote: One possible solution that I've thought about would be to remove the hardcoded selective parameter and let the set configuration determine if a set is selective or not (with missing = false), and then enable it for world and