On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
the code is documented as having 64bit limitations for any specific component.
the last release doesnt have the
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
the code is documented as having 64bit limitations
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file as being part of my package.
Looking into q's implementation (portage-utils-0.1.29), I see:
amit0 portage-utils-0.1.29 # grep -A 2 next_entry ./libq/vdb_get_next_dir.c
next_entry:
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused to
acknowledge an installed file as being part of my package.
Looking into q's implementation (portage-utils-0.1.29), I see:
amit0
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file as being part of my package.
Looking into q's implementation (portage-utils-0.1.29), I see:
amit0
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file as being part of my package.
Looking into q's implementation
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file as
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where
10 matches
Mail list logo
