Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 testDoebuild (portage.tests.ebuild.test_doebuild_fd_pipes.DoebuildFdPipesTestCase)... FAIL Travelling and stuff, but I'll try to look at it later; if you haven't got to it by then. - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 27 Dec 2015 23:58:42 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > --- > bin/phase-functions.sh | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) Pushed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny pgpEZVwgabBrA.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 15:06:08 +0100 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > testDoebuild > (portage.tests.ebuild.test_doebuild_fd_pipes.DoebuildFdPipesTestCase)... > FAIL > > Travelling and stuff, but I'll try to look at it later; if you haven't > got to it by then. You make it look

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] portage.xml.metadata: Include maintainer type per GLEP 67

2016-01-15 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:17:25 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > --- > pym/portage/xml/metadata.py | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) Pushed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny pgp87SFQapN3q.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Print WORKDIR & D sizes in build logs

2016-01-15 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 15/01/16 15:21, Michał Górny wrote: > You make it look like you noticed it before I pinged you about it! > :-P It was just a note for myself to fix it later or at least see to that someone else fixes it. > Looks like the test relies on the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 04 Jan 2016 19:17, Brian Dolbec wrote: > I immediately want to say REJECT!, REJECT!, REJECT!,... > ... > I would much prefer you re-base your patch on the rewrite code. reject != delay ... i don't mind waiting and rebasing -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature