Re: [gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Nick Rout wrote: === On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 13:13 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > /etc/init.d/named is a part of net-dns/bind installation. Imagine > the situation when I need to remove pdnsd from runlevel script and > add named tinstead of pdnsd. both bind and pdns provide the service &qu

Re: [gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
I have installed them _both_. But only one service is activated at a time. === On Friday 01 April 2005 13:13, Scott Taylor wrote: === On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 12:47 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: ... > rc-update -s > mpd | >mysql |

Re: [gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
. On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 12:47 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > Nick, > > You can see, I have net-dns/bind installed _only_. "named" is not added > to any runlevel script!! > > rc-update -s > ... > > mpd | >mys

Re: [gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-04-01 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
y 01 April 2005 12:18, Nick Rout wrote: === Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't bind and pdnsd both dns servers? I don't think you can run both at once (and why would you?) On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 03:39 +0400, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > I don't think it is Gentoo way. I have in

Re: [gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-03-31 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
I don't think it is Gentoo way. I have installed net-dns/bind, but it isn't added to any runlevel script. Deleting the /etc/init.d/named file will break a correctness of net-dns/bind installation. === On Friday 01 April 2005 01:47, A. Khattri wrote: === On Fri, 1 Apr 2005, Andre

[gentoo-user] Service named already provided by dns!

2005-03-31 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Hi, Each "Regenerating /etc/ld.so.cache" shows the message: * Caching service dependencies ... * Service 'named' already provided by 'dns'!; * Not adding service 'pdnsd'... What does it mean? I have not noticed any side effects. Andrew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] ECVS key for cvs revision

2005-03-26 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Hi! I need to modify a ebuild file which now works nice with SF CVS. The aim is to switch to some CVS revision rather use MAIN branch. Which ECVS_xyz key is appropriate here? Andrew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.4 - where is plastik?

2005-03-25 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Is kdeartwork emerged? (sorry, I have missed other this thread messages) Andrew === On Friday 25 March 2005 15:37, Robert S wrote: === > > emerge kwin > I've done that - no improvement. /usr/kde/3.4/share/apps/kwin/plastik.desktop is definitely there, but plastik (and the other .desktop

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] FTP-client with listing-encoding support

2005-01-29 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
5 18:31:32 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm looking for FTP client which has opportunity to > set directories/files-listing encoding. Is there such one? > > I have > > # echo $LANG > en_US.UTF-8 -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-user] [OT] FTP-client with listing-encoding support

2005-01-29 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Hi! I'm looking for FTP client which has opportunity to set directories/files-listing encoding. Is there such one? I have # echo $LANG en_US.UTF-8 Thanks! Andrew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Win key in KDE

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
I have already looked there: nobody use the Win key. But KMenu pops up nevertheless :-( === On Monday 24 January 2005 19:36, Neil Bothwick wrote: === On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:25:04 +0300, Andrew Gaydenko wrote: > Have not found the way to release Win key from the KDE Menu pop up >

[gentoo-user] [OT] Win key in KDE

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
Have not found the way to release Win key from the KDE Menu pop up (I'd like to use the key with StarDict). What have I missed? Andrew -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Secret bugs?

2005-01-24 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
The same. Indeed secret :-) Andrew === On Monday 24 January 2005 12:45, Sascha Dobbelaere wrote: === I can't acces et either... And I'm logged in -- Crasha -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Safe to upgrade glibc?

2005-01-23 Thread Andrew Gaydenko
The same. Probably, after gcc 3.3.x-3.4.x upgrading some recompiling is needed. It isn't so for glibc. Andrew === On Sunday 23 January 2005 14:22, Heinz Sporn wrote: === ... I never had a single issue with glibc although I didn't re-compile these systems once. Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2005,