[gentoo-user] kdevelop3.0 ~x86

2004-02-04 Thread LJN
anyone had trouble with this or does the ebuild work as it should? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Your current profile is deprecated...?

2004-02-02 Thread LJN
On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 00:24, Dan Egli wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Andrej Kacian wrote: > > | On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 23:36:02 + > | Matt Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > | > |>I just started to move my system over to ~x86 (just for kicks) and after > |>upda

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [normal] [gentoo-user] USB camera - almost

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 03:39, Jakub Krajcovic wrote: > yes, you have to have scsi disk support enabled (module or directly > enabled in the kernel). When you plug in the camera (given taht it > *really* supports usb mass storage), wait for a couple of seconds, and > then just type # mount -t vfat (a

[gentoo-user] emerge -uv world ([ebuild U ] dev-lang/perl-5.8.2-r1 [5.8.0-r12] +berkdb -doc +gdbm -threads and coresponding libperl(which installed ok))

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
There were some complaint about the same file being missing several times in the install, can't copy them tho as they're out of the buffer. I tried rerunning it, exactly the same. I synced just before this. I'm on an ext3 fs and it's never been shut down uncleanly. I'm on the latest stable gent

Re: [gentoo-user] Lightweight httpd

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 17:03, Peter Wu wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:53:43PM +, Eamon Caddigan wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > I'm thinking of setting up a small httpd on my desktop computer. Since I > > have a dynamic IP and no extra box to use as a "server", I just want > > something rea

[gentoo-user] OT: testing...

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
sorry for the inconvenience, just testing... -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Progress bars??

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 10:14, Eric La Londe wrote: > > how do you want to guess the time a package needs to compile? Like others > > that, a progress bar, that is hanging at 99% for ages is simple annoying. > > Additionally, I hate progress bars, if I could have real information > instead, > > Progr

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: The beauty of 2.6

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
Ok I want to switch for sure! Anyone who have tried 2.6 on an Asus p3b-f with Matrox G400 and 3com905 NIC? Any problems at all? On Sun, 2004-02-01 at 06:23, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Jakub Krajcovic wrote: > > Hi people, > > > > for all those that are skeptical about the 2.6 kernels, and for all >

Re: [gentoo-user] qmail-scanner and spamassassin config

2004-02-01 Thread LJN
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 23:01, Mike Williams wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday 31 January 2004 21:03, LJN wrote: > > ok am i wrong or shouldn't this config add the extra header tags to all > > mail(not just spam)? if so, do y

Re: [gentoo-user] Good Games Suggestions

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 22:11, Andrej Kacian wrote: > On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 23:08:58 +0200 > Wayne Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All > > > > Can anybody suggest anything from portage ??? > > > > I am not a "shoot 'em up" fan... > > Tuxracer :) bah! nethack!!! -- [EMAIL PROTECTE

[gentoo-user] qmail-scanner and spamassassin config

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
ok am i wrong or shouldn't this config add the extra header tags to all mail(not just spam)? if so, do you have any idea why it's not working? i've done 'rc-update add spamd default' and even rebooted. here are some config files. start /var/qmail/control/conf-common # Common Configura

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
I must have been sleeping all morning. http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36634 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39026 On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:57, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 13:00 CET LJN wrote: > > On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:41, Malte S. Str

[gentoo-user] changing bios time without rebooting

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
how'd i change the bios time without rebooting? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:41, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 12:33 CET LJN wrote: > > no it don't. > > One disadvantage of top-quoting: I don't know what you refer to. Does it > work now? Or doesn't it ask anymore? > > > On Sat,

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:16, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 06:07 CET LJN wrote: > > Oops, forgot to add the error message > > > > emerge -v dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin qmail-scanner > >[...] > > t/rfc2202Can't locate auto/Diges

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
no it don't. On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:16, Malte S. Stretz wrote: > On Saturday 31 January 2004 06:07 CET LJN wrote: > > Oops, forgot to add the error message > > > > emerge -v dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin qmail-scanner > >[...] > > t/rfc2202Can'

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
just added mysql to the useflags but that shouldn't change anything with this really. On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 06:07, LJN wrote: > Oops, forgot to add the error message > > emerge -v dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin qmail-scanner > Calculating dependencies ...done! > >>&

[gentoo-user] Trust wireless tablet 1200

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
I'm considering buying a Trust wireless tablet 1200, anyone know if it work with gentoo? how well it work? and of course, if the pressure sensors work? -- In 1968 it took the computing power of 2 C-64's to fly a rocket to the moon. Now, in 1998 it takes the Power of a Pentium 200 to run Microsof

Re: [gentoo-user] RootCommand in blackbox

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 08:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 12:51:42AM -0500, Andrey Kartashov wrote: > > > > Hi, all! > > > > I'm using blackbox wm and have noticed that the styles don't set the root > > window background because the feature is disabled by the > > > > epatc

Re: [gentoo-user] viruses

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 22:15, Peter Wu wrote: > If I write a shell script and attach to an email sent to you, then you > save the attached shell script and run it when you happen to have the > roott privilege? > > IIRC, any binary files can be attached to an email. Correct me if I am > wrong. if y

Re: [gentoo-user] viruses

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 20:43, Peter Wu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:15:06PM +0100, Norbert Kamenicky wrote: > > Well, some of the recent worms are activated by end users open an > attachment, which could be an vbs or an executable. It is the executable > that infects the system as most Windo

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
-- t/rfc2202.t 255 65280147 50.00% 8-14 Failed 1/1 test scripts, 0.00% okay. 7/14 subtests failed, 50.00% okay. make: *** [test_dynamic] Error 2 !!! ERROR: dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 failed. !!! Function src_compile, Line 22, Exitcode 2 !!! Tests didn't work o

[gentoo-user] dev-perl/Digest-HMAC-1.01-r1 fails on dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin install

2004-01-31 Thread LJN
Anyone got some idea why? everything before it have installed just fine. My emerge info output: Portage 2.0.49-r20 (default-x86-1.4, gcc-3.2.3, glibc-2.3.2-r9, 2.4.22-gentoo-r5) = System uname: 2.4.22-gentoo-r5 i686 Pentium III (Ka

Re: [gentoo-user] blockers

2003-11-24 Thread LJN
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 14:05, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2003 21:34, LJN wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 13:20, Jason Stubbs wrote: > > > On Monday 24 November 2003 19:50, LJN wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 11:19, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-user] blockers

2003-11-24 Thread LJN
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 13:20, Jason Stubbs wrote: > On Monday 24 November 2003 19:50, LJN wrote: > > On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 11:19, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > > > how would one deal with this situation? what options are there and why > > > is which better in what cases?

Re: [gentoo-user] blockers

2003-11-24 Thread LJN
hmm had forgotten to read the documentation, it's in here. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/portage-user.xml#doc_chap4 now, is there a better way? maybe to avoid risking the mentioned problem with missing a dependency check on the unmerge? On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 11:19, Lars Juel Nielsen wrote: > how w