On Saturday 31 January 2004 13:00 CET LJN wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:41, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 January 2004 12:33 CET LJN wrote:
> > > no it don't.
> >
> > One disadvantage of top-quoting: I don't know what you refer to. Does
&g
On Saturday 31 January 2004 12:33 CET LJN wrote:
> no it don't.
One disadvantage of top-quoting: I don't know what you refer to. Does it
work now? Or doesn't it ask anymore?
> On Sat, 2004-01-31 at 15:16, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > On Saturday 31 January 2004 06:0
On Saturday 31 January 2004 06:07 CET LJN wrote:
> Oops, forgot to add the error message
>
> emerge -v dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin qmail-scanner
>[...]
> t/rfc2202Can't locate auto/Digest/SHA1/reset.al in @INC (@INC
You need to install Digest::SHA1 first. I really wonder why the SpamAssassi
On Thursday 29 January 2004 02:40 CET Spider wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004 16:36:25 +0100 "Malte S. Stretz" wrote:
> > So what's the purpose of the --update switch, or better? Does it tell
> > emerge to recursively look at each and every dependecy and update it
> &g
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:36 CET I wrote:
> It actually seems to work, but now *I* am confused :) I've always used
> -u, but must admit that I don't istall stuff from ~x86 very often. And
> the manpage isn't very here.
>
> So what's the purpose of the --update switch, or better? Does it tell
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:16 CET Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> Did so many spammers changed their spam technics? What could be done (if
> possible only with SA's help) to reach my hit rate of 99% again? An
> update to SA version 2.60 did not change anything :(
Yes, they did change their
On Wednesday 28 January 2004 16:13 CET Bill Roberts wrote:
> On 15:48 Wed 28 Jan , Malte S. Stretz wrote:
> > I just wanted to try the SpamAssassin-2.63 ebuild (again, I already had
> > it installed before but accidently downgraded with the last 'emerge -u
> > world
Hi folks,
I just wanted to try the SpamAssassin-2.63 ebuild (again, I already had it
installed before but accidently downgraded with the last 'emerge -u
world'). So I went and typed in
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -upv dev-perl/Mail-SpamAssassin
to see what it needs. And I couldn't believe my e
On Friday 02 January 2004 16:21 CET Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> -- quoting Malte S. Stretz --
> > SA learns mail only once, so maybe it had seen those mails already
> > before? If not, you might want to run sa-learn with the -D (debug)
> > switch; that
On Wednesday 31 December 2003 16:43 CET Tom Wesley wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-31 at 15:34, Brian Downey wrote:
> > No big deal, the board has an Intel chipset. But the part that is
> > intriguing me is the "I20".
> >
> > I've always wondering what the I20 stuff really did in the kernel.
> >[...]
>
>
On Wednesday 31 December 2003 16:24 CET Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote:
> since my upgrade from SA version 2.55 to 2.60-r1 I cannot sa-learn
> anymore. With the previous version I could do a
>[...]
> Has anybody an idea what could be wrong here?
SA learns mail only once, so maybe it had seen those
On Wednesday 31 December 2003 12:03 CET Gerard Lledó wrote:
> On 05:18 Wed 31 Dec , Aaron Walker wrote:
> > 218.145.25.11 - - [28/Dec/2003:19:40:17 -0500] "GET
> > /scripts/nsiislog.dll HTTP/1.0" 404 286 "-" "-"
>
> I have thousand of those messages, unfortunately, it's usual :(
Once upon a ti
12 matches
Mail list logo
