Man I hate to be an email nazi, but people continue to do this, so here
goes (This is not directed at you personally, many people on this list
do this): Please don't top post. If you are not replying to a message,
start a new thread. If you are replying (even peripherally), practice
proper replying
* Rasmus Wiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [03.06.10 18:15]:
> Hi.
>
> I'm one of those guys who live on the edge (i.e. I don't back things
> up), but I'll soon send my laptop away for repair (the CPU has fried the
> fan bearings so they sound awful) so I'd like to do some kind of minimum
> backup.
>
> I
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 08:20:20PM -0700, Kent Jantz wrote:
> Ok, I will do that. I'm just worried that this is going to be a reoccurring problem
> in which case I guess I'm screwed.
you could just add the directory the problem files are in to the
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK, and they will be auto-repla
On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 09:00:04AM -0600, Mark D'voo wrote:
> I just switched today from kmail to evolution and I'm having a problem
> with setting up SpamAssassin. In kmail my filters looked like this:
>
> if
> matches regular expr .
> then
> pipe through spamc
>
> The problem is in evolution
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 09:26:57AM +, Ernie Schroder wrote:
> Against War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against
> War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Ag
> ainst War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against War! Against W
>
> I, a
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 03:41:53PM +, Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote:
> Here is my cflag variable.
>
> CFLAGS="-march=pentium4 -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
>
> (1) According to the CFlags Central thread on forums and the gcc manual
> optimisations page (link [1]) the -O3 flag includes the
> -fo
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:00:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Still not a good thing. There could be some new option in the config
> file that needs setting. Anyway, with the exception of the XFree
True, but that is not relevant to the very reasonable notion that
default config files that
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 02:12:23PM -0500, Matthew Gatto wrote:
> > > There is also colordiff, if you ain't into vim. It's a tiny little
> > > wrapper on diff with the same syntax as diff and therefore appropriate
> > > for use in the etc-update.conf.
> >
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 10:37:33AM -0800, Spundun Bhatt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 10:18, Matthew Gatto wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:20:30AM -0600, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > > > Is there a reason why etc-update doesn't use colors in the output, just like
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 06:20:30AM -0600, Alec Berryman wrote:
> > Is there a reason why etc-update doesn't use colors in the output, just like
> > emerge? This could make it much more easy to merge files.
>
> It's not etc-update that doesn't do color, it's diff. Check out your
> /etc/etc-update
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:19:19AM -0500, Johnh wrote:
> I just emerged this this morning.
> I updated the passwd and the groups files, like the instructions said.
>
> I did a few emerges afterwards and everything worked fine.
>
> However, when I try to
> emerge -p xfree
>
> this is what I get:
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:39:01AM +1300, Tom Eastman wrote:
> That being the case, I'd still like to use symmetrical encryption.
> But now I have to find a way to automate the entry of the passphrase
> in a backup script.
why bother? why not just use a keypair (asymmetrical), and backup the
keypa
12 matches
Mail list logo
