Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-- quoting Bjorn Sodergren --
I would rather see apache 2.0 ebuild renamed to apache2 , so if we
wanted to use apache 2.0 we could, than make a mistake like this.
Emerge apache2 instead of just apache
I second that!
Richard Watson said:
Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO this kind of upgrade should happen on purpose because someone
chose to do it, not as the result of emerge -u.
But emerge -u IS on purpose. Nobody just has that in their cron to run
every night. (At least I HOPE nobody
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Richard Watson said:
Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
IMO this kind of upgrade should happen on purpose because someone
chose to do it, not as the result of emerge -u.
But emerge -u IS on purpose.
What I mean is that I want to do major upgrades
On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Richard Watson wrote:
Richard Watson said:
Matthias F. Brandstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But emerge -u IS on purpose.
What I mean is that I want to do major upgrades when I'm ready, not
when the package maintainers decide that I'm ready.
I'm hearing php does not play nice with apache2. Not a huge deal since I
already run apache2, but it's bound to be for some folks.
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 22:12, Donny Davies wrote:
Sometime this weekend (likely Friday or Saturday) Robin and I
will move these two packages to non-arch-masked
