You did a great job Robin. I think as it stands now the program really
provides a nice set of best-case scenario flags (Which is what I prefer
most). If in the future you extend it to include experimental more
strict optimizations, great, but as it stands now I like it. Thanks for
providing
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 05:04:18PM -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
They might be referring to the genflags package, it comes with
strangely names info2flags, info2host and host2flags. It parses your
machine information and spits back safe/fast flags for you. Kind of a
middle ground. Not freakishly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, that program looks rather dull ... arch and -O3 pipe ... big deal :)
What about C++ optimizations such as -fmemoize-lookups and -fsave-memoized
???
I'll speek up in defense of the developers (whoever those mythical
creatures are), they are not at version 1.0 yet
: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1.4_final CFLAGS Generation?
They might be referring to the genflags package, it comes with strangely
names info2flags, info2host and host2flags. It parses your machine
information and spits back safe/fast flags for you. Kind of a middle
They might be referring to the genflags package, it comes with strangely
names info2flags, info2host and host2flags. It parses your machine
information and spits back safe/fast flags for you. Kind of a middle
ground. Not freakishly optimized, but also not going to cause you to
segfault at
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 1.4_final CFLAGS Generation?
They might be referring to the genflags package, it comes with strangely
names info2flags, info2host and host2flags. It parses your machine
information and spits back safe/fast flags for you. Kind of a middle
ground. Not freakishly
I'm bootstrapping 1.4 as we speak, and I didn't see any signs of CFLAG generation.
luke
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 05:35:13PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
I'm just wondering. This is the announcement from www.gentoo.org: 1.4
includes automated kernel builds, CFLAGS generation, the Gentoo
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:14:37PM -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
Well, that program looks rather dull ... arch and -O3 pipe ... big
deal :) What about C++ optimizations such as -fmemoize-lookups and
-fsave-memoized ???
The amount of optimization that comes from -O3 -march=... versus running
I'm just wondering. This is the announcement from www.gentoo.org: 1.4
includes automated kernel builds, CFLAGS generation, the Gentoo Reference
Platform, and support for netless installation.
Where/how is/do you do the CFLAGS generation!?
Nathaniel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 09:16:22PM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Well, that program looks rather dull ... arch and -O3 pipe ... big
deal :) What about C++ optimizations such as -fmemoize-lookups and
-fsave-memoized ???
I'll speek up in defense of the developers
10 matches
Mail list logo