Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Tom Wesley
On Saturday 02 August 2003 22:58, Adam Mercer wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 03:34:38PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote: Why is gentoo still using the headers from 2.4.19??? Shouldn't we be using the headers of the kernel we have installed?? No, you should be using the headers from the

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Tom Wesley wrote: On Saturday 02 August 2003 22:58, Adam Mercer wrote: On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 03:34:38PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote: Why is gentoo still using the headers from 2.4.19??? Shouldn't we be using the headers of the kernel we have installed?? No,

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Spider
begin quote On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 10:59:41 +0100 (WEST) those who already know more than half of it. And what does the expression the headers from the kernel that glibc was built against It means that glibc needs a -static- set of headers that -do not change- in the life of glibc. They live

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Spider wrote: begin quote On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 10:59:41 +0100 (WEST) those who already know more than half of it. And what does the expression the headers from the kernel that glibc was built against It means that glibc needs a -static- set of headers that -do not

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Spider
begin quote On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:04:01 +0100 (WEST) Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) The headers that were present when glibc was compiled (regardless of what kernel was used to compile it and what kernel one is using now)? -- I wouldn't dream of doing that! So, a) is the

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Jorge Almeida
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003, Spider wrote: begin quote On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:04:01 +0100 (WEST) Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) The headers that were present when glibc was compiled (regardless of what kernel was used to compile it and what kernel one is using now)? --

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Ian Truelsen
On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 22:03:20 +0200 Spider [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: begin quote On Sun, 3 Aug 2003 13:04:01 +0100 (WEST) Jorge Almeida [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a) The headers that were present when glibc was compiled (regardless of what kernel was used to compile it and what

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-03 Thread Spider
If the kernel headers are updated, say from 2.4.18 to 2.4.19-r1, as is my case, do I need to rebuild glibc, or anything, to avoid unpleasantness? That should not be necessary, I assume whoever was responsible for that will have tested it thoroughly. The problems you may percieve are not

[gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-02 Thread Kurt V. Hindenburg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why is gentoo still using the headers from 2.4.19??? Shouldn't we be using the headers of the kernel we have installed?? [ebuildU ] sys-kernel/linux-headers-2.4.19-r1 [2.4.19] - -- ^^^ Kurt There is no good nor evil; there is only power.

Re: [gentoo-user] 2.4.19 headers?

2003-08-02 Thread Adam Mercer
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 03:34:38PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote: Why is gentoo still using the headers from 2.4.19??? Shouldn't we be using the headers of the kernel we have installed?? No, you should be using the headers from the kernel that glibc was built against not the kernel you have