Harald Arnesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
>>>
>>> It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
>>> for most applications I have tested.
>>
>> Curious... can I compile the Linux k
Matthew Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
>>
>> It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
>> for most applications I have tested.
>
> Curious... can I compile the Linux kernel and GLIBC with it? I guess
> thats were most a
Harald Arnesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
>
> It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
> for most applications I have tested.
Curious... can I compile the Linux kernel and GLIBC
I googled a bit today and found out that some people have tried this
too. But they hadn't much success. Maybe the latest version of icc is
more gcc compatible than older ones. In the gentoo forum you can find a
discussion about that topic.
MfG
Michael
Brian Budge wrote:
I've thought of doing so
I've thought of doing something like that too... building the whole system
using icc. Has anyone done this? I'd be slightly worried that some of
the builds written in C++ wouldn't compile.
Brian
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Michael Gruetzner wrote:
> That sounds ok to me. But how can I find out wha
That sounds ok to me. But how can I find out what ebuilds support icc.
I'd like to try some others than povray. Maybe QT or KDE woul be good
but I'm not sure if this will work - probably not :-( .
Michael
Brian Budge wrote:
ICC can produce faster code, but it won't always... It tends to be abou
ICC can produce faster code, but it won't always... It tends to be about
5% faster on my own
path tracer. One thing to note is that there are several compiler options
for optimization. There are things like global interprocedural opts, even
interfile opts, and you can also compile using stati
Harald Arnesen wrote:
Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
for most applications I have tested.
I just testet it with povray. The gcc compiled version of povray is
faster than th
Harald Arnesen wrote:
Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
for most applications I have tested.
How can I switch from gcc to icc? Can I do this with gcc-config?
MfG
Michael
--
/*
Brian Budge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
>>
>> It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
>> for most applications I have tested.
> Interesting... what flags were you using for the two compilers? Which
> version of ICC whe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 02 July 2003 02:30, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
>
> It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
> for most applications I have tes
Interesting... what flags were you using for the two compilers? Which
version of ICC where you using?
I haven't noticed more than maybe a 10% difference, and I like the ability
to use the more standards compliant gcc...
On Wed, 2 Jul 2003, Harald Arnesen wrote:
> Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECT
Martin LORANG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
It produces _much_ faster code than gcc (even the very latest 3.4-stuff)
for most applications I have tested.
--
Hilsen Harald.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
ICC is generally pretty compatible with all the gcc compiled libraries.
It also CAN be faster, but isn't really all that much faster than the
newer versions of gcc. I prefer gcc because it is closer to conforming to
the C++ standard...
Brian
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Zack Gilburd wrote:
> On T
On Tuesday 24 June 2003 14:40, Martin LORANG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Am I right if I say there are only 4 packages that support ICC ?
I may be totally misunderstanding ICC<, but all C compilers should be able to
compile the same stuff. A software developer shouldn't need to (in the real
world, som
Hi all,
Am I right if I say there are only 4 packages that support ICC ?
app-games/crafty/crafty
dev-libs/blitz/blitz
dev-libs/boost/boost
media-gfx/povray/povray
Or is there something wrong with my script ?
What is exactely the benefit of ICC ?
Martin
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
16 matches
Mail list logo
