Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Sendmail question

2005-02-14 Thread Ow Mun Heng
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 15:47, Andrea Barisani wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:41:16PM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: > > I'm pretty sure I've got mailman working now, so I move on to preparing > > sendmail for use by my remote users. I looked at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > > and couldn't help but n

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Sendmail question

2005-02-14 Thread Phil Sexton
On Mon, 2005-02-14 at 02:47, Andrea Barisani wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:41:16PM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: > > I'm pretty sure I've got mailman working now, so I move on to preparing > > sendmail for use by my remote users. I looked at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > > and couldn't help but n

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Sendmail question

2005-02-14 Thread Mike Noble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Sullivan wrote: | I'm pretty sure I've got mailman working now, so I move on to preparing | sendmail for use by my remote users. I looked at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc | and couldn't help but notice that it was much much shorter than my | Fedora Cor

Re: [gentoo-user] OT - Sendmail question

2005-02-13 Thread Andrea Barisani
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 08:41:16PM -0600, Michael Sullivan wrote: > I'm pretty sure I've got mailman working now, so I move on to preparing > sendmail for use by my remote users. I looked at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > and couldn't help but notice that it was much much shorter than my > Fedora Core 1

[gentoo-user] OT - Sendmail question

2005-02-13 Thread Michael Sullivan
I'm pretty sure I've got mailman working now, so I move on to preparing sendmail for use by my remote users. I looked at /etc/mail/sendmail.mc and couldn't help but notice that it was much much shorter than my Fedora Core 1 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc file was out-of-the-box. I was wondering what featu