On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 03:02:24PM -0400, Owen Gunden wrote:
I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
production enviroment?
We use exim for out production environment, as to my previous
I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
production enviroment?
Owen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wednesday 04 June 2003 10:34, Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
go.
What do you think? Pros
On Saturday 14 June 2003 12:02, Owen Gunden wrote:
I'm curious why Exim never made it into this discussion. Is it considered
to be in a different class of MTAs? Nobody's using Exim in a large
production enviroment?
Owen
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Correct. I have never used Exim
Yeah, just be advised that running postfix with mailman is a PITA.
Of course, getting mailman built properly with qmail wan't quite
a joy, either, but it was just a small modification to the ebuild.
Mailman with postfix was a PITA on FreeBSD, too...
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 06:32, brett holcomb
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes down to the point
where someone says that either the qmail license or Bernstein
sucks. But personal feelings or FUD feeded knowledge are not the base
to choose an MTA.
What kind of license is it???
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:00:49 +0100
Andy Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 11:45:21AM +0200, Frank Tegtmeyer
wrote:
The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes
down to the point
where someone says that either the qmail license or
-- quoting Larry Wright --
Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say that there is some other
editor *besides* emacs?
hehe, I have a good one too: why is this nano the default editor on
Gentoo LiveCD? *nocommentsplease*
--
Mmm ... gummy-bear
- Homer Simpson
--
[EMAIL
Yes .. that editor draws a lot of air.
Tom Veldhouse
- Original Message -
hehe, I have a good one too: why is this nano the default editor on
Gentoo LiveCD? *nocommentsplease*
--
Mmm ... gummy-bear
- Homer Simpson
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a bit..odd..
If you never tried qmail you may have read nothing from the author. If
this is the case why do you spread this nonsense then?
The discussion Postfix vs. qmail nearly always comes
-user] Postfix vs. Qmail
Jonathan Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Never used qmail, but I've heard the author/license/etc is a
bit..odd..
If you never tried qmail you may have read nothing from the
author. If this is the case why do you spread this nonsense then?
The discussion
Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say that there is some other editor
*besides* emacs?
:)
On Thursday 05 June 2003 04:51 am, DE SMET Bram (BDSR) wrote:
Let us try to stop this before it gets into a flamewar.
Next thing we know, people are going to say that emacs is better than vi
;-)
Hehehe glad you understand my point!
-Original Message-
From: Larry Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: donderdag 5 juni 2003 12:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Postfix vs. Qmail
Npw wait a minute, are you trying to say that there is some
other editor
Good to know. Thanks.
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 00:27:00 -0400 (EDT)
Rev. Jeffrey Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or
what
made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to
it?
Primarily, the
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups
take is on these two. I am
currently contemplating either of the two for mail at the ISP level. I like
Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
go.
What do you think? Pros and Cons for both.
Bobby R. Cox
Personally, I prefer Qmail + Vpopmail combination, since it is easier to setup
and run. Further more, qmail is lightweight MTA and it is running on my
servers even under high load without taking much CPU time, comparing to
sendmail and probably other monsters in the same situation.
regards,
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:34:34 -0600 Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to
go.
What do you think?
Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the groups take is on
these two. I am currently contemplating either of the two for mail at
the ISP level. I like Postfix, but have been told Qmail is the way to go.
What do you think? Pros and Cons for both.
This could end
What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
Thanks.
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:05:20 -0500 (CDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003, Bobby R. Cox wrote:
I thought I would poll the masses and see what the
groups take is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
What made Postfix so good you never looked back. Or what
made Qmail such that you never wanted to go back to it?
Primarily, the configuration. Postfix's configuration seems alot more
straight forward to me. Qmail was not HARD to configure,
20 matches
Mail list logo
