[gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem Benchmarks

2005-01-07 Thread Francesco Talamona
On Friday 07 January 2005 02:10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I did run a little benchmark earlier today without seeing this thread. I had been suffering from Reiser3 for quite some time and switched to Reiser4 yesterday. Reiser4 was really nice in that it made my disk really silent. It is

[gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem Benchmarks

2005-01-06 Thread leffeman
On 06-01-05 17:30 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: I like reiserfs WITHOUT notail, I've experienced *large* disk usage savings. Then again, I don't have the 10k (or even 1k) of messages talked about on this list. Just a silly request, but could you please check if the output of du

[gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem Benchmarks

2005-01-06 Thread leffeman
On 06-01-05 14:07 -0800, death rince wrote: Hi, I was browsing through benchmarks of Reiserfs and other filesystem when I came across this, http://linuxgazette.net/102/piszcz.html Can anyone please give an insight, behind the rationale of such tests and what exactly it signifies in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Filesystem Benchmarks

2005-01-06 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Thursday 06 January 2005 06:58 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 06-01-05 17:30 -0600, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: I like reiserfs WITHOUT notail, I've experienced *large* disk usage savings. Then again, I don't have the 10k (or even 1k) of messages talked about on this list. Just a