Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-08 Thread Jim Hatfield
# wget http://www.francesco-riosa.com/gentoo/old/attr-2.4.19.tbz2 # tar -C /mnt/gentoo -jxvf attr-2.4.19.tbz2 if you still miss something try to post the output of ldd /usr/bin/package-that-fail Looks like that's done it. Many thanks. I'll treat depclean with the greatest respect in the

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-08 Thread Bastian Balthazar Bux
Jim Hatfield ha scritto: # wget http://www.francesco-riosa.com/gentoo/old/attr-2.4.19.tbz2 # tar -C /mnt/gentoo -jxvf attr-2.4.19.tbz2 if you still miss something try to post the output of ldd /usr/bin/package-that-fail Looks like that's done it. Many thanks. I'll treat depclean with the

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-08 Thread Alastair Murray
Bastian Balthazar Bux wrote: don't forget to reemerge those two packages They're both part of coreutils actually. (Just in case parent didn't know.) Alastair Murray -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-08 Thread Alastair Murray
Alastair Murray wrote: They're both part of coreutils actually. (Just in case parent didn't know.) As soon as I sent that I realised that that is mostly wrong. You can reemerge coreutils with USE=-acl in your make.conf to remove the need for these packages, it was possibly -acl being added

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-07 Thread Jim Hatfield
Try to run revdep-rebuild to remerge the missing dependencies. It should bring your system back to normal. Also consider using the dep-script (see below for URL) made by ecatmur instead of the broken emerge --depclean. URL: http://home.jesus.ox.ac.uk/~ecatmur/my-bin/dep revdep-rebuild invokes

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-07 Thread Jim Hatfield
On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 10:32:10 - , in local.gentoo.users you wrote: if you can boot from cd AND you have an athlon you can do this: boot from rescue, mount your hd root # wget http://www.francesco-riosa.com/gentoo/old/acl-2.2.27.tbz2 # tar -C /mnt/gentoo -jxvf acl-2.2.27.tbz2 where /mnt/gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-07 Thread Jim Hatfield
if you can boot from cd AND you have an athlon you can do this: boot from rescue, mount your hd root # wget http://www.francesco-riosa.com/gentoo/old/acl-2.2.27.tbz2 # tar -C /mnt/gentoo -jxvf acl-2.2.27.tbz2 where /mnt/gentoo is your hd root mount point Well it seemed to like that - now it

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-07 Thread Bastian Balthazar Bux
Jim Hatfield ha scritto: if you can boot from cd AND you have an athlon you can do this: boot from rescue, mount your hd root # wget http://www.francesco-riosa.com/gentoo/old/acl-2.2.27.tbz2 # tar -C /mnt/gentoo -jxvf acl-2.2.27.tbz2 where /mnt/gentoo is your hd root mount point Well it

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-05 Thread Bastian Balthazar Bux
Alastair Murray ha scritto: Jim Hatfield wrote: ls: error while loading shared libraries: libacl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: no such file or directory I also experienced this after a depclean (I didn't realise libacl and libattr where critical at the time). However, I didn't reboot so

[gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-04 Thread Jim Hatfield
I've had an ever-growing backlog of packages to update, all blocked by xfce: term2 root # emerge --update world Calculating world dependencies ...done! !!! Error: the xfce-base/xfce4-base package conflicts with another package. !!!both can't be installed on the same system together. !!!

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-04 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Friday 04 February 2005 11:21 am, Jim Hatfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've had an ever-growing backlog of packages to update, all blocked by xfce: term2 root # emerge --update world Calculating world dependencies ...done! !!! Error: the xfce-base/xfce4-base package conflicts with

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-04 Thread Karsten Baumgarten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jim Hatfield wrote: | I've had an ever-growing backlog of packages to update, all blocked | by xfce: | | |term2 root # emerge --update world |Calculating world dependencies ...done! | |!!! Error: the xfce-base/xfce4-base package conflicts with another

Re: [gentoo-user] So depclean *is* dangerous after all!

2005-02-04 Thread Alastair Murray
Jim Hatfield wrote: ls: error while loading shared libraries: libacl.so.1: cannot open shared object file: no such file or directory I also experienced this after a depclean (I didn't realise libacl and libattr where critical at the time). However, I didn't reboot so using already running or