On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:31:43 -0800
Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sigh... I just love linux...
>
> Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
> Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to
> specify the version I want? Would I then not
Man... you get a something to work and then something else doesn't. I
got the matrox powerdesk app to compile and run. But then it makes a
dialog box with textfields to enter the path to the XF86Config file and
a backup XF86Config and when I click okay, it kills my X server!
Anyway, my question
Nevermind... got it... it's "emerge \
b
Ben Munat wrote:
Brett Mansfield wrote:
I also (like many others) have gtk-1.2 and gtk-2 installed. IMHO the
easiest thing to do is:
"emerge gtk-1.2.x gtk-2.x.x"
which will install them both at the same time. (this is what I did
(IIRC)) and have had no p
Brett Mansfield wrote:
I also (like many others) have gtk-1.2 and gtk-2 installed. IMHO the
easiest thing to do is:
"emerge gtk-1.2.x gtk-2.x.x"
which will install them both at the same time. (this is what I did
(IIRC)) and have had no problems, YMMV.
Just tried "emerge -p gtk-1.2.x", "emerge -
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Just do something like
'emerge \I've tried several variations on this and it always says "there are no
masked or unmasked builds to satisfy ... " Things like:
emerge -p \<=x11-libs/gtk+1.2.10
emerge -p \<=gtk+1.2.10
emerge -p \<=gtk+2
emerge -p \<=x11-libs/gtk+2.0
etc.
Wha
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:04, Ben Munat wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the quick responses...
>
> So, using the rpm version sounds easiest... or, would I still need
> gtk+1.2 even if I did use the rpm? And emerge says it wants to install
> about two dozen packages (perl, mysql(??), postgres(??), etc.
Thanks everyone for the quick responses...
So, using the rpm version sounds easiest... or, would I still need
gtk+1.2 even if I did use the rpm? And emerge says it wants to install
about two dozen packages (perl, mysql(??), postgres(??), etc. etc.) in
order to give me rpm... do I really need all o
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 02:31, Ben Munat wrote:
> sigh... I just love linux...
>
> Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
No, I have them both installed. Portage installs gtk+1.2 and gtk+2.x to
different slots automatically.
> Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerg
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:31:43 -0800 Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
| Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to
| specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion
| progra
Ben Munat wrote:
sigh... I just love linux...
Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to
specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion
programs that expect gtk 2.0?
Also, th
Ben Munat wrote:
sigh... I just love linux...
Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to
specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion
programs that expect gtk 2.0?
Also, t
sigh... I just love linux...
Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2?
Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to
specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion
programs that expect gtk 2.0?
Also, the matrox powerdes
Ben Munat wrote:
Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0?
I'm trying to compile the matrox powerdesk program to setup my dual
monitors but the .configure fails because it can't find gtk-config. It
seems that gtk+2.0 now uses pkg-config instead of gtk-config. Can I just
creat
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:55:57 -0800 Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0?
No, unfortunately not.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail:ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0?
I'm trying to compile the matrox powerdesk program to setup my dual
monitors but the .configure fails because it can't find gtk-config. It
seems that gtk+2.0 now uses pkg-config instead of gtk-config. Can I just
create a symlink from
15 matches
Mail list logo