Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Collins
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:31:43 -0800 Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > sigh... I just love linux... > > Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? > Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to > specify the version I want? Would I then not

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Man... you get a something to work and then something else doesn't. I got the matrox powerdesk app to compile and run. But then it makes a dialog box with textfields to enter the path to the XF86Config file and a backup XF86Config and when I click okay, it kills my X server! Anyway, my question

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Nevermind... got it... it's "emerge \ b Ben Munat wrote: Brett Mansfield wrote: I also (like many others) have gtk-1.2 and gtk-2 installed. IMHO the easiest thing to do is: "emerge gtk-1.2.x gtk-2.x.x" which will install them both at the same time. (this is what I did (IIRC)) and have had no p

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Brett Mansfield wrote: I also (like many others) have gtk-1.2 and gtk-2 installed. IMHO the easiest thing to do is: "emerge gtk-1.2.x gtk-2.x.x" which will install them both at the same time. (this is what I did (IIRC)) and have had no problems, YMMV. Just tried "emerge -p gtk-1.2.x", "emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Andrew Gaffney wrote: Just do something like 'emerge \I've tried several variations on this and it always says "there are no masked or unmasked builds to satisfy ... " Things like: emerge -p \<=x11-libs/gtk+1.2.10 emerge -p \<=gtk+1.2.10 emerge -p \<=gtk+2 emerge -p \<=x11-libs/gtk+2.0 etc. Wha

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Brett Mansfield
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 12:04, Ben Munat wrote: > Thanks everyone for the quick responses... > > So, using the rpm version sounds easiest... or, would I still need > gtk+1.2 even if I did use the rpm? And emerge says it wants to install > about two dozen packages (perl, mysql(??), postgres(??), etc.

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Thanks everyone for the quick responses... So, using the rpm version sounds easiest... or, would I still need gtk+1.2 even if I did use the rpm? And emerge says it wants to install about two dozen packages (perl, mysql(??), postgres(??), etc. etc.) in order to give me rpm... do I really need all o

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Janne Johansson
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 02:31, Ben Munat wrote: > sigh... I just love linux... > > Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? No, I have them both installed. Portage installs gtk+1.2 and gtk+2.x to different slots automatically. > Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerg

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 16:31:43 -0800 Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? | Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to | specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion | progra

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Ben Munat wrote: sigh... I just love linux... Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion programs that expect gtk 2.0? Also, th

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread michael fivis
Ben Munat wrote: sigh... I just love linux... Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion programs that expect gtk 2.0? Also, t

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
sigh... I just love linux... Ok, so I assume it would be bad/impossible to *also* install gtk+1.2? Meaning I should unmerge 2.0 and emerge gtk again with some option to specify the version I want? Would I then not be able to use a zillion programs that expect gtk 2.0? Also, the matrox powerdes

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Ben Munat wrote: Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0? I'm trying to compile the matrox powerdesk program to setup my dual monitors but the .configure fails because it can't find gtk-config. It seems that gtk+2.0 now uses pkg-config instead of gtk-config. Can I just creat

Re: [gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 01 Jan 2004 15:55:57 -0800 Ben Munat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0? No, unfortunately not. -- Ciaran McCreesh Mail:ciaranm at gentoo.org Web: http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-user] gtk+1.2 vs gtk+2.0

2004-01-01 Thread Ben Munat
Can I compile a program expecting gtk+1.2 if I have gtk+2.0? I'm trying to compile the matrox powerdesk program to setup my dual monitors but the .configure fails because it can't find gtk-config. It seems that gtk+2.0 now uses pkg-config instead of gtk-config. Can I just create a symlink from