Re: [gentoo-user] make.conf CFLAGS

2003-03-02 Thread Stanislav Karchebny
В сообщении от 3 Март 2003 05:22 Daniel Carrera написал(a): > Oh, in that case I'm fairly sure it would be fine. Like you said, the > cores are identical, only difference is that the Athlon has more cache. > I would be surprised if the -mathlon-xp optimization used the infomation > about the cach

RE: [gentoo-user] make.conf CFLAGS

2003-03-02 Thread Peter Vertes
work with your Duron if you set your CPU type to "athlon-tbird". Haven't had any problems with these optimizations. -Pete -Original Message- From: Amiel Martin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 17:07 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gentoo-user] make.

Re: [gentoo-user] make.conf CFLAGS

2003-03-02 Thread Daniel Carrera
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:09:25PM -0800, Amiel Martin wrote: > thanks, that helps a lot > I guess my question about using the wrong flags was more if I overoptimize > like if I use -mathlon-xp on my duron Oh, in that case I'm fairly sure it would be fine. Like you said, the cores are identical,

Re: [gentoo-user] make.conf CFLAGS

2003-03-02 Thread Amiel Martin
thanks, that helps a lot I guess my question about using the wrong flags was more if I overoptimize like if I use -mathlon-xp on my duron Daniel Carrera wrote: hi, I have a few questions about setting compiler flags in make.conf. 1. what will happen if I get the wrong flags? will the binary just n

[gentoo-user] make.conf CFLAGS

2003-03-02 Thread Amiel Martin
hi, I have a few questions about setting compiler flags in make.conf. 1. what will happen if I get the wrong flags? will the binary just not run? or will it run will possibly undetectible errors? or will little bsd daemons start setting fire to my computer? 2. what flags would you recommend for