Hi All-
I needed to fill out a PDF form today, so I figured I'd try the new Adobe
Acrobat Reader 7. I did the following:
`ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -pv acroread`
And subsequently emerged the package without the -pv. All went well, and
acroread seems to work happily enough on my box. I'm
On Apr 6, 2005 1:12 PM, David D. Rea [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Hi All-I needed to fill out a PDF form today, so I figured I'd try the new AdobeAcrobat Reader 7. I did the following:`ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 emerge -pv acroread`And subsequently emerged the package without the -pv. All went well,
* David D. Rea
The only place I can find some semblance of a recommendation to prevent
this behavior is here:
http://users.dslextreme.com/~craig.lawson/linux_notes/gentoo_portage.html
Read the section on Portage in the Gentoo Handbook and the portage
man-page. The handbook section that deals
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=3chap=3
or, simply
# echo '=app-text/acroread-7.0 ~x86' /etc/package.keywords
W
On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 01:12:12PM -0500, David D. Rea wrote:
Hi All-
I needed to fill out a PDF form today, so I figured I'd try the new Adobe
On Wed, April 6, 2005 1:32 pm, Scott Jones said:
Dave,
I believe that
echo =app-text/acroread-7.0 ~x86 /etc/portage/package.keywords
will fix your problem. Basically you put programs you want to have masked
~x86 in the file package.keywords in the directory /etc/portage
Scott Jones
On Friday 01 April 2005 04:07, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:46:31 +0200 Christoph Gysin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Juergen Fiedler wrote:
| If you really feel the need to cram it all onto one line, you could
| #CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=CFLAGS emerge something
|
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Rout wrote:
I thought perhaps
CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} emerge foo
no doubt some dev guru will tell me I am way out of line :-)
wrong! there's nothing wrong with doing that. If it was something like
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS you were
gentoo-user@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Rout wrote:
I thought perhaps
CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} emerge foo
no doubt some dev guru will tell me I am way out of line :-)
wrong! there's nothing wrong with doing that. If it was something
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 05:40:24PM +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
gentoo-user@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
So, the correct way would be (??):
#CFLAGS=whatever
#CXXFLAGS=CFLAGS
#emerge something
If you really feel the need to cram it all onto one line, you could
#CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=CFLAGS
Juergen Fiedler wrote:
If you really feel the need to cram it all onto one line, you could
#CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=CFLAGS emerge something
without the typo and even smaller:
# CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=$CFLAGS emerge something
SCNR
Christoph
--
echo mailto: NOSPAM !#$.'*'|sed 's. ..'|tr * !#:2
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 20:46:31 +0200 Christoph Gysin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Juergen Fiedler wrote:
| If you really feel the need to cram it all onto one line, you could
| #CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=CFLAGS emerge something
|
| without the typo and even smaller:
| # CFLAGS=whatever
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Aaron Walker wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nick Rout wrote:
I thought perhaps
CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} emerge foo
no doubt some dev guru will tell me I am way out of line :-)
wrong! there's nothing wrong with doing that. If it
There may not be nothing wrong with it, but it is nevertheless almost as
crappy way to do it. This is because the next time the package with custom
CFLAGS gets updated as part of a world/system update, it will be emerged
with the default CFLAGS again...
In these cases it is better to manage
If you look at the new kernel guide,
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml, you'll notice that
there's some weird stuff going on with the reference to kernel names.
Section 2 references gentoo-dev-sources, but then if you read the whole
thing it refers to
Search the forums and bugzilla. This a RFE, and there are at least a few
scripts and patches to do this. Currently, stock portage does not do
this.
On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 23:14 +0200, Antonio Coralles wrote:
How can I tell portage to use specific CFLAGS for a particular package
without temporary
I thought perhaps
CFLAGS=whatever CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} emerge foo
no doubt some dev guru will tell me I am way out of line :-)
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:14:48 +0200
Antonio Coralles wrote:
How can I tell portage to use specific CFLAGS for a particular package
without temporary changing my
Portage wants to emerge hardened-sources via 'emerge -Du world' but I
use hardened-dev-sources and that's what is in the world file. Why
does it want to emerge hardened-sources?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Grant wrote:
Portage wants to emerge hardened-sources via 'emerge -Du world' but I
use hardened-dev-sources and that's what is in the world file. Why
does it want to emerge hardened-sources?
Maybe your kernel is no longer marked as a dev- kernel:
# emerge -pv
Portage wants to emerge hardened-sources via 'emerge -Du world' but I
use hardened-dev-sources and that's what is in the world file. Why
does it want to emerge hardened-sources?
Maybe your kernel is no longer marked as a dev- kernel:
# emerge -pv hardened-sources
These are the
On Tue, 29 Mar 2005, Grant wrote:
That's weird. I get this from 'emerge -pDu world':
[ebuild NS ] sys-kernel/hardened-sources-2.4.28-r5
I have hardened-dev-sources in my world file.
Exactly - so what Im suggesting is that maybe the current kernel in
hardened-dev-sources has moved
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you look at the new kernel guide,
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml, you'll notice that
there's some weird stuff going on with the reference to kernel names.
Section 2 references gentoo-dev-sources, but then if you read the whole
thing
If you look at the new kernel guide,
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gentoo-kernel.xml, you'll notice that
there's some weird stuff going on with the reference to kernel names.
Section 2 references gentoo-dev-sources, but then if you read the whole
thing it refers to gentoo-sources-2.6, so maybe
Michael Haan wrote:
I've just about got my mythtv box finished and I'm turning my eyes to
the job of maintaining it. I know there are several routine things I
should be doing, but I'm curious just how often I should be doing
them. Any advice as to when I should be doing some of the routine
I was runnning a emerge --sync and portage died at the end:
deleting app-accessibility/gnome-mag/files/digest-gnome-mag-0.11.11
deleting app-accessibility/gnome-mag/files/digest-gnome-mag-0.10.4
Number of files: 113281
Number of files transferred: 2980
Total file size: 88664800 bytes
Total
On Saturday 05 March 2005 04:38, Michael Haan wrote:
I've just about got my mythtv box finished and I'm turning my eyes to
the job of maintaining it. I know there are several routine things I
should be doing, but I'm curious just how often I should be doing
them. Any advice as to when I
# emerge -upD --newuse world
...
[ebuild UD] x11-libs/qt-3.3.3 [3.3.4-r2]
...
How can I find what packages are requiring x11-libs/qt-3.3.4 ??
Julien.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:07:05 +0100, Julien Cayzac wrote:
How can I find what packages are requiring x11-libs/qt-3.3.4 ??
emerge -uDt world
--
Neil Bothwick
THE BORG: Calm, Cool and Collective...
pgpKeVjaXqHac.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:27:02 +, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I find what packages are requiring x11-libs/qt-3.3.4 ??
emerge -uDt world
You saved my day, thanks :)
that was app-i18n/uim-qt :(
Julien.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I've just about got my mythtv box finished and I'm turning my eyes to
the job of maintaining it. I know there are several routine things I
should be doing, but I'm curious just how often I should be doing
them. Any advice as to when I should be doing some of the routine
portage/package version
Daevid Vincent wrote:
I finally figured out why portage keeps fluctuating between upgrading and
downgrading these packages. It seems that every time I upgrade system or
world, it isn't the right version. *sigh*
I added '-t' to my emerge and discovered a package that isn't in my keywords
file.
I finally figured out why portage keeps fluctuating between upgrading and
downgrading these packages. It seems that every time I upgrade system or
world, it isn't the right version. *sigh*
I added '-t' to my emerge and discovered a package that isn't in my keywords
file.
daevid edb # emerge
On Saturday 05 February 2005 03:53, David Corbin wrote:
The box in question is publicly accessible. Why have another port open if
I don't need to? Besides, I can't get rsyncd to start correctly, so I was
looking for alternatives.
Use:
rsync --recursive --links --safe-links --perms --times
On Saturday 05 February 2005 03:53, David Corbin wrote:
The box in question is publicly accessible. Why have another port open if
I don't need to? Besides, I can't get rsyncd to start correctly, so I was
looking for alternatives.
Can't check from here, but probably you can use ssh or
perhaps you could alias the rsync command to include the parameters you
need.
Why do you want to do this, its not exactly sensitive info?
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:57 -0500, David Corbin wrote:
I have one machine on my system that I as a portage sync target for others.
Is there anyway to
On Friday 04 February 2005 03:49 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
perhaps you could alias the rsync command to include the parameters you
need.
Why do you want to do this, its not exactly sensitive info?
I don't want to run rsyncd on the box in question...
On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 20:57 -0500, David
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 20:03 -0500, David Corbin wrote:
On Friday 04 February 2005 03:49 pm, Nick Rout wrote:
perhaps you could alias the rsync command to include the parameters you
need.
Why do you want to do this, its not exactly sensitive info?
I don't want to run rsyncd on the box
ok, gotcha
for downloading source tarballs you can specify the downloader command
to use any command you like. There doesn't seem to be an equivalent
option for rsync'ing the portage tree.
As I said finding some way to alias the rsync command to womething like
rsync -e ssh username@
I have one machine on my system that I as a portage sync target for others.
Is there anyway to have portage sync from this target using rsync over ssh,
rather than straight rsync?
Thanks
David
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Hi gentoo folks, I`ve got a problem with portage and sloted gcc3.3.x and
gcc-3.4.x
In my /etc/portage/package.keywords I have following line:
sys-devel/gcc -~x86
Portage wants to install only gcc-3.3.x keyworded as x86. But my
default compiler is gcc-3.4.1-r2 wich is keyworded as ~x86 and
sys-devel/gcc -~x86
snip
Is it normal or my fault ?
Looks like it's your fault, assuming the first line quoted is a copy
paste from package.keywords: you don't need the - before ~x86 - in
other words, it should read:
sys-devel/gcc ~x86
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
I'm just curious to know if there is a way to get rid of
portage: Update command slotmove =dev-java/rhino-1.5* 1.5 invalid;
skipping.
portage: Update command slotmove =dev-java/rhino-1.6* 1.6 invalid;
skipping.
thanks,
antonio
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 30 January 2005 19:12, Antonio Coralles wrote:
I'm just curious to know if there is a way to get rid of
portage: Update command slotmove =dev-java/rhino-1.5* 1.5 invalid;
skipping.
portage: Update command slotmove =dev-java/rhino-1.6* 1.6 invalid;
skipping.
emerge --sync :)
--
When I try to emerge -uDav world it is trying to upgrade cups to newer
version that doesn't exist!
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] net-print/cups-1.1.23 [1.1.23_rc1]
When I try to compile it I get:
!!! Couldn't download cups-1.1.23-source.tar.bz2. Aborting.
But checking
Maybe the package hasn't made it to the mirrors yet. The ebuild can exist
but not the packages. Try again later.
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005, Joseph wrote:
When I try to emerge -uDav world it is trying to upgrade cups to newer
version that doesn't exist!
Calculating world dependencies ...done!
Yes, this is the case.
What puzzled me is that I couldn't find new ebuild even on Gentoo
server; it appeared maybe two hours after I rsync.
--
#Joseph
On Fri, 2005-01-07 at 22:51 -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Maybe the package hasn't made it to the mirrors yet. The ebuild can exist
but not
There is a bug on this - the ebuild has a bad SRC_URI. I just did another
sync and the cups ebuild shows up as being downloaded. As soon as portage
stops udating it's cache I'll see if that fixes the problem.
On Fri, 7 Jan
2005, Joseph wrote:
Yes, this is the case.
What puzzled me is
Nope, didn't work. Maybe tomorrow there will be an updated ebuild.
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
There is a bug on this - the ebuild has a bad SRC_URI. I just did another
sync and the cups ebuild shows up as being downloaded. As soon as portage
stops udating it's cache I'll
I want my ccache directory to be shared across all users. However, portage
is not liking that idea. I've set up CCACHE_DIR so that it's in the
default profile (to use it instead of ~/.ccache) and then chown'd it
(recursively) to root:root and chmod'd it (recursively) to a=rwx. I've
also set
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I want my ccache directory to be shared across all users. However, portage
is not liking that idea. I've set up CCACHE_DIR so that it's in the
default profile (to use it instead of ~/.ccache) and then chown'd it
(recursively) to root:root and chmod'd it
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:11 pm, Alec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I want my ccache directory to be shared across all users. However,
portage is not liking that idea. I've set up CCACHE_DIR so that it's
in the default profile (to use it instead of ~/.ccache)
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday 05 January 2005 07:11 pm, Alec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
I want my ccache directory to be shared across all users. However,
portage is not liking that idea. I've set up CCACHE_DIR so that it's
in the default profile
Hi all,
Everytime I install a Gentoo on a system, I curse and scream about one of
the major flaws in portage.
Whenever I want just one program emerged, say, on a laptop using xfce4 on
xfree, USE=-kde -esd -arts -alsa -oss:
I want to emerge anjuta, portage wants gnomelibs, which in turn want
Timo,
I'm installing Gentoo in a laptop and had a similar problem, but
just adding -kde -arts to the USE variable in /etc/make.conf did the
trick.
Regards
Jose
Timo Lindemann escribió:
Hi all,
Everytime I install a Gentoo on a system, I curse and scream about one
of the major
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:21:11 +0100, Jose Gonzlez Gmez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jose,
Timo,
I'm installing Gentoo in a laptop and had a similar problem, but
just adding -kde -arts to the USE variable in /etc/make.conf did the
trick.
I stated quite explicitly that USE does NOT solve
Timo,
No problem. Whenever somebody says This works for me it doesn't
mean he thinks you are stupid nor necessarily he misses the point. It
just mean This works for me, maybe the problem is in another place. I
just was trying to help you, and I hope I can finally do it. Let's see,
in my
ZsoL wrote:
Hi!
After emerging something, i get the following:
* Processed 391 info files: 5 errors; run with emerge --verbose to view
errors.
Even though, everything works just fine. Anybody can help me how to
get rid of
this error?
I have had this same thing for a while now. Nothing has been
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:06:45 +0100, Jose González Gómez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose,
no, no, no and NO. The problem is that i want to emerge licq, licq asks
for kdelibs, and kdelibs for arts. I said emerge licq which NEEDS
kdelibs, but NOT arts. I proposed a mode where just the PRIMARY and
Timo,
I'm not a KDE expert neither an expert in compiling, but it seems
kdelibs *needs* arts to be compiled, so this is not a fault of portage,
this is a fault of KDE, as they are not giving this option.
From COMPILING in kdelibs-3.1 (sorry I haven't the latest version
installed):
begin quote
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:16:08 +0100
Timo Lindemann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:06:45 +0100, Jose González Gómez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose,
no, no, no and NO. The problem is that i want to emerge licq, licq
asks for kdelibs, and kdelibs for arts. I said
Timo Lindemann wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:06:45 +0100, Jose González Gómez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jose,
no, no, no and NO. The problem is that i want to emerge licq, licq asks
for kdelibs, and kdelibs for arts. I said emerge licq which NEEDS
kdelibs, but NOT arts.
Calm down and
Timo Lindemann wrote:
Next thing, I want licq. I pretend. Guess what appears on the list? artsd!
I cant stand it, really. Gentoo would be such a nice distro, but it is ALL
BLOATED.
$ emerge -pv licq
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
ZsoL wrote:
| Hi!
| After emerging something, i get the following:
|
| * Processed 391 info files: 5 errors; run with emerge --verbose to view
| errors.
|
| Even though, everything works just fine. Anybody can help me how to
get rid of
| this error?
|
On Friday 13 February 2004 8:11 am, Kathy Wills wrote:
| ZsoL wrote:
| * Processed 391 info files: 5 errors; run with emerge --verbose
| to view
errors.
|
| I have had this same thing for a while now. Nothing has been found
| to
get rid of it. Everything runs and works fine so I don't even
|
I checked the faq for this, but nothing there.
I'd just like to get a listing of what packages are installed at any one
point in time.
Anyone?
Thanks.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 02/12/04 Kevin wrote:
I checked the faq for this, but nothing there.
I'd just like to get a listing of what packages are installed at any
one point in time.
Anyone?
either `emerge gentoolkit; qpkg -I -v` or `ls /var/db/pkg/*`
--
Public Key at http://www.genone.de/info/gpg-key.pub
emerge epm
epm -qa
http://www.karkomaonline.com/article.php?story=20030908215509618
http://www.karkomaonline.com/article.php?story=20030615210800645
Regards.
Alberto
On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 22:28, Kevin wrote:
I checked the faq for this, but nothing there.
I'd just like to get a listing of
thanx that helped me a lot too.
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:46:16 +0100
kko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
emerge epm
epm -qa
http://www.karkomaonline.com/article.php?story=20030908215509618
http://www.karkomaonline.com/article.php?story=20030615210800645
Regards.
Alberto
On Thu, 2004-02-12
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
After emerging something, i get the following:
* Processed 391 info files: 5 errors; run with emerge --verbose to view
errors.
Even though, everything works just fine. Anybody can help me how to get rid of
this error?
ZsoL
- --
ICQ#: 66782170
Hi All,
I've seen some notes about SLOTs in portage (in gentoo docs),
but can't find detailled explanation of what is this and
how it works/is implemented.
Could anyone point me to the right docs ?
Sincerely,
Alex
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [gentoo-user] portage slots
Hi All,
I've seen some notes about SLOTs in portage (in gentoo docs),
but can't find detailled explanation of what is this and
how it works/is implemented.
Could anyone point me to the right docs ?
Sincerely,
Alex
--
[EMAIL
On February 10, 2004 15:42, phil wrote:
Are you running reiserfs or have had any lockups? when i first
installed gentoo i was using rfs and locked it a few times (badly
configured kernel ,acpi-nforce2 issue) which badly messed up some
files and forced me to reinstall with ext3,which seems to
On Wed, 11 Feb 2004 10:58:41 -0700
Jared Thirsk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On February 10, 2004 15:42, phil wrote:
Are you running reiserfs or have had any lockups? when i first
installed gentoo i was using rfs and locked it a few times (badly
configured kernel ,acpi-nforce2 issue) which
Kurt V. Hindenburg kirjoitti (sunnuntai, 8. helmikuuta 2004 23:07):
It should not have been made stable if there is a chance of screwing
up the entire portage system such that it will not work...
So, in other words no version of portage should ever be marked stable. Writing
a piece of software
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:42 am, Jani-Matti Hätinen wrote:
| Kurt V. Hindenburg kirjoitti (sunnuntai, 8. helmikuuta 2004 23:07):
| It should not have been made stable if there is a chance of
| screwing up the entire portage system such that it will not
| work...
| So, in other words no
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 6:02 pm, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
On Tuesday 10 February 2004 11:42 am, Jani-Matti Hätinen wrote:
| Kurt V. Hindenburg kirjoitti (sunnuntai, 8. helmikuuta 2004 23:07):
| It should not have been made stable if there is a chance of
| screwing up the entire portage
Are you running reiserfs or have had any lockups? when i first installed
gentoo i was using rfs and locked it a few times (badly configured
kernel ,acpi-nforce2 issue) which badly messed up some files and forced
me to reinstall with ext3,which seems to be a bit more forgiving.
Jared Thirsk
First the error message I got:
===
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portage # emerge -u world -p
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 2513, in ?
if not mydepgraph.xcreate(myaction):
File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems some
people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the update?
Should I update?
succesfull here... working for two days.
greetz
tom
-BEGIN
On Sat, 07 Feb 2004 21:08:20 +, Anthony Hoppe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems some
people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the update?
Should I update?
I updated portage and I had some strange errors. After that
Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems
some people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the
update? Should I update?
~ Anthony
I didn't have any problems with it.
--
Kathy Wills
Hi all,
I have a strange problem with portage, but it seems I am not alone with it.
Since some weeks I get this error line after compiling or merging
anything:
* Caching service dependencies...
awk: cmd. line:2: (FILENAME=/etc/init.d/xfs FNR=290) warning: error writing
standard output
-- quoting Matthias F. Brandstetter --
I have a strange problem with portage, but it seems I am not alone with
it. Since some weeks I get this error line after compiling or merging
anything:
* Caching service dependencies...
awk: cmd. line:2: (FILENAME=/etc/init.d/xfs
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 16:08, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems
some people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the
update? Should I update?
No problems here on 4 different machines.
Sean
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
One system had no problem - I merged portage, then it gave me strange
stuff searching and doing a build but then I reran them and it went
away. The other system had problems but I ran python-updater and
ldconfig (not in that order) and that fixed it.
Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update
They should not have made 2.0.50 stable... it is crap!
% emerge
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 14, in ?
import portage
File /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.py, line 6377, in ?
for y in db[/][porttree].dbapi.xmatch(match-all, x):
File
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
% emerge
You aren't passing any arguments to emerge?
On the assumption you passed something like world...check your world
file for any packages that are qulaified with a version number. I removed
the version number from the one file that had one
Try running ldconfig, then if that doesn't help python-updater.
Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
They should not have made 2.0.50 stable... it is crap!
% emerge
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 14, in ?
import portage
File /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.py, line 6377,
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 15:30:56 -0500 Kurt V. Hindenburg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| They should not have made 2.0.50 stable... it is crap!
No, it's a user error. Portage can't fix those.
| raise KeyError, Specific key requires an operator (%s) (try
| adding an '=') % (mydep)
| KeyError:
On Sunday 08 February 2004 3:42 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | raise KeyError, Specific key requires an operator (%s) (try
| |
adding an '=') % (mydep)
| | KeyError: Specific key requires an operator
| | (kde-base/kdelibs-3.2.0_alpha1) (try adding an '=')
|
|
| Look for
On Sun, 2004-02-08 at 20:52, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
On Sunday 08 February 2004 3:42 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| | raise KeyError, Specific key requires an operator (%s) (try
| | adding an '=') % (mydep)
| | KeyError: Specific key requires an operator
| |
On Saturday 07 February 2004 22:08, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems some
people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the update?
Should I update?
~ Anthony
no problems here.
--
Conclusions
In a straight-up fight, the
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 03:52:31PM -0500, Kurt V. Hindenburg wrote:
Ik had simular errors and could solve some of them by unpacking the
portage-rescue package in /usr/portage/sys-apps/portage/files
However I now get errors like:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
Can anyone shed any light on this:
# emerge -upD world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world dependencies -Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 2513, in ?
if not mydepgraph.xcreate(myaction):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 1105, in
begin quote
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Simon Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone shed any light on this:
# emerge -upD world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
KeyError: Specific key requires an operator (app-editors/vim-6.2-r5)
(try adding an
Same result.
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 09:12:21PM -0500, Brett I. Holcomb wrote:
Try running ldconfig and see what happens.
Simon Matthews wrote:
Can anyone shed any light on this:
# emerge -upD world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating world
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 03:19:01AM +0100, Spider wrote:
somewhere, either in /var/cache/edb/world,virtuals or /etc/portage/*
you have the string app-editors/vim-6.2-r5 that is incorrect, and you
need an = in front of it. find it, and it will be fixed.
It looks like I have a TON of them with
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Spider wrote:
begin quote
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 18:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Simon Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone shed any light on this:
# emerge -upD world
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
KeyError: Specific key requires an
On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 09:08:20PM +, Anthony Hoppe wrote:
Is it safe to update Portage? I've been reading about the problems some
people have been having. Has anybody been successful with the update?
Should I update?
I did 'update world' this weekend. It failed after updating portage
Hello,
my portage system just died after I installed it some 2 hours ago.
I get the following meggage when typing emerge or etc-update:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 14, in ?
import portage
File /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.py, line 6111, in ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
my portage system just died after I installed it some 2 hours ago.
I get the following meggage when typing emerge or etc-update:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 14, in ?
import portage
File /usr/lib/portage/pym/portage.py, line
1 - 100 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
